Board index ‹ Super League ‹ London Broncos ‹ Has the teams slump affected this site

No you are wrong it is Rupe1 always is

The change back to being London Broncos has nothing to do with it, there were never that many posting here. Yes it has dropped a little again this season but when you start from a low base there is not far you can drop!

It is the season combined with the negativeness there so often is!

Being the Broncos again has brought me to more games than i ever attended as Quins, much prefer the stand alone identity (no puns please ) but not the results and thats why attendences at matches and forums are both down. On top of this there are one or two on here who are obsessed with running the club down, they raise some good points but some so petty there beyond belief. Having said that this is still a must read forum everyday with some terrific knowledge, opinions and humour.

Bronco believer wrote:

Having said that this is still a must read forum everyday with some terrific knowledge, opinions and humour.

The above statement rules out Gutterfax/Rupe1 Paul and other notable miscreants.

What a childish and embarrassing response by Gutterfax. I'd be ashamed to respond to any criticism the way he has.

My point about him being a reason for this site being poor is simple really, all he posts is marketing threads, attendance threads and a pile of facts that have flaws within them (or a combination of all three). There are so many of these threads you can put up with and I imagine, that like me, people are very bored of them.

Moe Lester wrote:

What a childish and embarrassing response by Gutterfax. I'd be ashamed to respond to any criticism the way he has.

My point about him being a reason for this site being poor is simple really, all he posts is marketing threads, attendance threads and a pile of facts that have flaws within them (or a combination of all three). There are so many of these threads you can put up with and I imagine, that like me, people are very bored of them.

Unless Marketing and stats are your thang

Moe Lester wrote:

What a childish and embarrassing response by Gutterfax. I'd be ashamed to respond to any criticism the way he has.

My point about him being a reason for this site being poor is simple really, all he posts is marketing threads, attendance threads and a pile of facts that have flaws within them (or a combination of all three). There are so many of these threads you can put up with and I imagine, that like me, people are very bored of them.

Your User Control Panel offers you the (rather stupidly named) Friends and Foes option.

[Dave Lister]

Moe Lester wrote:

What a childish and embarrassing response by Gutterfax. I'd be ashamed to respond to any criticism the way he has.

My point about him being a reason for this site being poor is simple really, all he posts is marketing threads, attendance threads and a pile of facts that have flaws within them (or a combination of all three). There are so many of these threads you can put up with and I imagine, that like me, people are very bored of them.

double post

[Dave Lister]

Moe Lester wrote:

What a childish and embarrassing response by Gutterfax. I'd be ashamed to respond to any criticism the way he has.

My point about him being a reason for this site being poor is simple really, all he posts is marketing threads, attendance threads and a pile of facts that have flaws within them (or a combination of all three). There are so many of these threads you can put up with and I imagine, that like me, people are very bored of them.

The only embarrassing thing is how much his posts are getting to you...

What are the odds glumfox responds to the accusation of using flawed data? Moe’s challenge is like a red rag to a bull.