WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Tick Tock
 

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:49 pm
TRB User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:43 am
Posts: 10748
Location: Wacky Field
Fully wrote:
But you woefully neglect the rest of the sentence just to suit your pathetic personal digs at me. If you re-read, I think you'll find the words "if", which suggests that there has to be a chance it is a risk worth paying if it can come off and was in direct response to I_A's post previously, which states "it's a big risk for a private individual." If there is no chance, then no, there isn't any point really.

I refuse to accept anything said by Wakefield fans who know absolutely zip about GH or inside GH other than rumours and forum posts. There is nothing stopping GH except money. If we had money, it would have been built or would be built. It seems to be you that cannot grasp that fact.

Please, please return to the discussion and stop focusing on your personal attentions of me.


You ask for all that you recieve I'm afraid and ostrich like impression is at times cringeworthy. I take no pleasure in having to exchange messages to correct your niaive attempts to find flaws within our potential new ground and I am on record in several places suggesting that I wish GH the best of luck - I genuinely want both, so yes - it is only you who seem to try to take the high ground but only result in what others see as merely 'trolling'.

As for GH, it is possible that other people have contact with companies and individuals who are directly or indirectly involved in what's going on down there - I am aware of a couple at least - and some who have feed-back from some high-level executives of companies linked with buying WR in particular. To not accept that anything said outside of RW's office is just unbelievable and undermines any credibility that you may otherwise accrue.

The truth is that you cannot build GH at this time - it may be because of money (including the £1m link road no-one wants to pay for), but you cannot 'build it tomorrow' and it will take a long time and some significant political will (which I think you have) to change that!
"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"

For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto http://www.swag-online.co.uk

For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto http://wakefield.rlfans.com

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:53 pm
TRB User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:43 am
Posts: 10748
Location: Wacky Field
TRB wrote:
You ask for all that you recieve I'm afraid and ostrich like impression is at times cringeworthy. I take no pleasure in having to exchange messages to correct your niaive attempts to find flaws within our potential new ground and I am on record in several places suggesting that I wish GH the best of luck - I genuinely want both, so yes - it is only you who seem to try to take the high ground but only result in what others see as merely 'trolling'.

As for GH, it is possible that other people have contact with companies and individuals who are directly or indirectly involved in what's going on down there - I am aware of a couple at least - and some who have feed-back from some high-level executives of companies linked with buying WR in particular. To not accept that anything said outside of RW's office is just unbelievable and undermines any credibility that you may otherwise accrue.

The truth is that you cannot build GH at this time - it may be because of money (including the £1m link road no-one wants to pay for), but you cannot 'build it tomorrow' and it will take a long time and some significant political will (which I think you have) to change that!


Apologies for the English - but you get the gist! :wink:
"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"

For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto http://www.swag-online.co.uk

For the latest details on the Supporters Trust, log onto http://wakefield.rlfans.com

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:54 pm
kinleycat User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 1:05 pm
Posts: 9949
Location: In the shed aerating my wort!!!

Fully wrote:
But you woefully neglect the rest of the sentence just to suit your pathetic personal digs at me. If you re-read, I think you'll find the words "if", which suggests that there has to be a chance it is a risk worth paying if it can come off and was in direct response to I_A's post previously, which states "it's a big risk for a private individual." If there is no chance, then no, there isn't any point really.

I refuse to accept anything said by Wakefield fans who know absolutely zip about GH or inside GH other than rumours and forum posts. There is nothing stopping GH except money. If we had money, it would have been built or would be built. It seems to be you that cannot grasp that fact.

Please, please return to the discussion and stop focusing on your personal attentions of me.

Oh well at least you've finally grasped that concept, now then this flat world you keep banging on about............
READ THE AUP:
http://forums.rlfans.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=438945&tsmp=1381997916

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:29 pm
M62 J30 TRINITY Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:49 pm
Posts: 1631
Without trawling through all today's posts and not getting wound up by the inbred trolls, just a brake down how we stand.
Last Monday ldf resulted in Newmarket being advised to come out of green belt.
PI decision was due today but been delayed no timescale announced.
Council meeting tomorrow to discuss LDF (why couldn't they meet before PI decision)
We could be given the green light from tomorrow onwards.

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 6:37 pm
Sandal Cat User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:35 pm
Posts: 2843
M62 J30 TRINITY wrote:
Without trawling through all today's posts and not getting wound up by the inbred trolls, just a brake down how we stand.
Last Monday ldf resulted in Newmarket being advised to come out of green belt.
PI decision was due today but been delayed no timescale announced.
Council meeting tomorrow to discuss LDF (why couldn't they meet before PI decision)
We could be given the green light from tomorrow onwards.


Thats pretty much as I see it.

Council meeting dates are often set up months in advance so the date will have been set before the date of the PI announcement. The Council will endorse its own LDF tommorow so will become "law" and the land will be taken our of greenbelt and desingated as B8 which in planning terms is distribution.

I would not be surprissed if we get an announcement before the end of the week but I cannot see any reason why we will have to wait much longer. There is however I believe a 6 week period by which there could (unlikely) be a Judicial Review so we are noy clear until 6 weeks from the announcement.
LOOKING FOR ACCOMMODATION IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA
http://www.orlandovilla.org.uk

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:10 pm
El Rey User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:21 pm
Posts: 27039
Location: In the fridge
bren2k wrote:
Fully will be on the Cas forum later, encouraging people to do everything possiblet to challenge the LDF; FACT!



I've been trying to pick out the username but so far it alludes me.
onetiger = half a cabbage

The night is dark and full of terrors.

Winter is coming.

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:18 pm
mwildcats User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 9:17 am
Posts: 8292
Is it not hudds tigers?!
ADAM WATENE & LEON WALKER R.I.P.

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:37 pm
Gronk! User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:45 pm
Posts: 4789
mwildcats wrote:
Is it not hudds tigers?!


It is, rather obvious too isn't it?

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:55 pm
imwakefieldtillidie User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 1518
bren2k wrote:
Fully will be on the Cas forum later, encouraging people to do everything possiblet to challenge the LDF; FACT!


HuddsTiger wrote:
The Council cannot pay for maintenance. That will be the responsibility of Wakefield District Community Trust. If not them, the owners.

If the Council do put any money towards upkeep I expect all Cas fans to do something about it - I don't want MY taxes going towards things like that when the roads are a joke, Pontefract Hospital is struggling to make ends meet and other things need prioritising.


He likes to portray himself as the voice of reason, but (if it is the same person) in reality he seems quite devious.

Re: Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:01 pm
Fully User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 8247
How is that devious?

I think that there are better things to be prioritising taxes on right at this minute, just as I wouldn't think it would be right if you lot were paying in any way more than what is already agreed for the Cas stadium. Is Ponte A+E not an issue? Are public transport stations, for the most part, not a bit of a joke and in dire need of improvement? Are the roads not a state? They certainly are where I've been and the amount of potholes are becoming ridiculous. Sorry but now you're just being silly to portray me in a bad light. And this could really be classified as harassment.

As I've already mentioned anyway, that is the responsibility of WDCT/whoever owns it (and this is something I've said on one of the other threads on the Cas RLFans page in the last few days too and was agreed with by I_A). Anyway, back on topic, I would suggest.
Image
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1873, alegend, eric35, FickleFingerOfFate, Hank Moody, JINJER, Joe Banjo, M62 J30 TRINITY, MC_Wildcat, pitchy, Redscat, The Avenger, TOMCAT, Tricky2309, Upanunder, vastman, Yosemite Sam and 200 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Wakefield Trinity


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORD (DATE)
4,484,1951,51975,5754,491 (28-03-2016)
Google Analytics Unique Monthly Users : 118,226 (May 2016)
DOWNLOAD OUR NEW ANDROID APP CLICK HERE!
YOUR CLUB : Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
R
L
F
A
N
A
L
Y
T
I
C
S


Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Change these prefs/or turn this off...

FIXTURES/RESULTS

W/D/L DATE COMP HOME AWAY
L Fri 23rd Sep SL STS 32 12 WAK
L Thu 15th Sep SL WAK 12 18 HFC
L Fri 9th Sep SL WAK 10 14 CAT
L Fri 2nd Sep SL CAS 46 22 WAK
L Sun 21st Aug SL WID 40 8 WAK
L Sun 14th Aug SL WAK 10 38 WAR
L Fri 5th Aug SL WIG 60 12 WAK
L Sun 24th Jul SL WAK 20 46 CAS
W Sat 16th Jul SL CAT 28 30 WAK
L Fri 8th Jul SL WIG 22 18 WAK
L Sun 3rd Jul SL WAK 32 44 STS
L Fri 17th Jun SL WAK 6 32 LEE
W Sun 12th Jun SL HUD 2 10 WAK
L Thu 2nd Jun SL WAK 16 54 HKR
L Fri 27th May SL SAL 38 8 WAK
W Sun 22nd May SL WAK 25 24 CAT
W Sun 15th May SL WAK 36 28 WAR
W Sun 8th May CC2016 WAK 40 22 TOU
W Fri 29th Apr SL WID 16 18 WAK
L Sun 24th Apr SL WAK 28 46 HFC
W Fri 15th Apr CC2016 WAK 44 10 SHE
W Sun 10th Apr SL WAK 62 0 WIG
W Sat 2nd Apr SL WAK 32 18 SAL
W Mon 28th Mar SL LEE 16 20 WAK
W Fri 25th Mar SL WAK 36 22 HUD
L Fri 18th Mar SL HFC 22 4 WAK
L Fri 11th Mar SL STS 44 4 WAK
L Sun 6th Mar SL WAK 28 42 CAT
L Fri 26th Feb SL WAR 34 16 WAK
W Sun 21st Feb SL HKR 12 14 WAK
L Sun 14th Feb SL CAS 40 6 WAK
L Sun 7th Feb SL WAK 16 24 WID
Tab two Tab three

Copyrite RLFanalytics 2016
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
  4th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
TOULOUSE
v
BATLEY  
  5th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
SWINTON
v
LONDON  
  5th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
ROCHDALE
v
DEWSBURY  
  5th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
OLDHAM
v
SHEFFIELD  
  5th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
HULL KR
v
BRADFORD  
  5th Feb : 15:00
CH-R1
HALIFAX
v
FEATHERSTONE  
  9th Feb : 20:00
SL-R1
ST. HELENS
v
LEEDSTV  
  10th Feb : 20:00
SL-R1
WIDNES
v
HUDDERSFIELD  
  10th Feb : 20:00
SL-R1
CASTLEFORD
v
LEIGHTV  
  11th Feb : 15:00
SL-R1
SALFORD
v
WIGAN  
  11th Feb : 18:00
SL-R1
CATALANS
v
WARRINGTONTV