WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Questions that need to be answered

Board index Super 8s - Qualifiers Leeds Rhinos - southstander.com Questions that need to be answered

 

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:55 pm
ThePrinter Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:19 pm
Posts: 8598
Location: Behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza, Dallas, Texas.
Gotcha wrote:
Does he defend two in from that position for the under 20's? as with McDermotts tactics, he would be if in first team.


No but neither did Delaney when McClennen played him at RIGHT centre in 2010, so doing that on the left centre wouldn't be much fun for him either.

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:49 pm
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8238
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
Gotcha wrote:
Does he defend two in from that position for the under 20's? as with McDermotts tactics, he would be if in first team.


One would hope that the club has a set pattern of play for the U20's and the 1st team. It would make it then a smooth transition from U20's to senior squad as everyone would know what they are doing.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 5:14 pm
craigizzard Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 5:10 pm
Posts: 3664
DHM wrote:
One would hope that the club has a set pattern of play for the U20's and the 1st team. It would make it then a smooth transition from U20's to senior squad as everyone would know what they are doing.


The U20s outstanding results suggest this is unlikely.

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:17 pm
nantwichexile Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:57 pm
Posts: 5487
RoyFrancis wrote:
None of the above, just wait and see! :wink:


Soooo come on ..what do you know ? :D

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:48 pm
Homer Simpson User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 2:30 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield.

nantwichexile wrote:
Another one determined to ignore the successful academy team. Not a lot of point having one really is there ?


Oh he's happy to have one, but farm them out o lower league teams, hoping they will get an Admin job (see Halifax), so they dont come back
It's Official - "Homer Simpson is a Leeds Fan"

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Wed Jun 20, 2012 7:23 am
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8238
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
craigizzard wrote:
The U20s outstanding results suggest this is unlikely.


That made me laugh on the outside and cry on the inside.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Wed Jun 20, 2012 9:44 am
West Leeds Rhino User avatar
Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:31 am
Posts: 482
Location: Leeds
nantwichexile wrote:
Geez .. I was only trying to stimulate debate. I base my opinions on what I have seen and heard live and on TV/radio; no more. How "WORTHWHILE" that is I don't know, but nowhere have I ever professed to be the ultimate all knowing oracle ( unlike others ). There was no need for G1 to reply with a retort no doubt meant to provoke.... Can't see any other reason for the content. I chose to largely ignore it with a flippant riposte on his continued apostrophe faux pas.

Next thing I have a host of his apologists demanding I take heed of his absolutely sacrosant valid point that I am repeating myself.

I apologise for my crime ..... M c Dermott and the boys I adore you unquestioningly and I promise no more undue irreverence. You can all do no wrong. Bow bow scrape scrape..... I will attend every match too before I dare to pass adverse opinion again ...

Phooey :)


At no point did I suggest that you should forfeit your right to opinion. It just annoys me ever so slightly when you spout off about aspects of a match you have not witnessed, and usually one of the first to do so. I never said you had to attend every match, but watching, or listening to commentary would be a good start. Your aversion to the idea of attending games, should you be able, is your choice, albeit poorly reasoned.

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Wed Jun 20, 2012 11:39 am
El Diablo User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:01 am
Posts: 12106
Location: The Middle of the Land
Nantwich, you're obviously entitled to your opinions, and entitled to post them. Equally, however, once you do it on a public forum, people are entitled to question how well informedthey are.

May I enquire as to how many times you've watched our successful academy team this year?

Incidentally, on the "what's the point in having the academy" question, I'd argue that providing players in the current season isn't really its core purpose at all. It is, surely, supposed to be providing FUTURE players, isn't it? I'm not saying that means academy players shouldn't play in the first team, just that if they don't that doesn't negate the whole purpose of its existence, as you appeared to suggest.

Further, at the risk of being labelled a G1 apologist, you ARE repeating yourself, and again, while you're entitled to do so, the rest of us are equally entitled to point out that we might find it boring to the point of being irritating enough that we respond to it. Which I suppose means you have succeeded in stimulating debate, it just might not be the debate you were aiming for.

Just saying.
OBN Wannabe

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Wed Jun 20, 2012 1:00 pm
nantwichexile Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:57 pm
Posts: 5487
El Diablo wrote:
Nantwich, you're obviously entitled to your opinions, and entitled to post them. Equally, however, once you do it on a public forum, people are entitled to question how well informedthey are.

May I enquire as to how many times you've watched our successful academy team this year?

Incidentally, on the "what's the point in having the academy" question, I'd argue that providing players in the current season isn't really its core purpose at all. It is, surely, supposed to be providing FUTURE players, isn't it? I'm not saying that means academy players shouldn't play in the first team, just that if they don't that doesn't negate the whole purpose of its existence, as you appeared to suggest.

Further, at the risk of being labelled a G1 apologist, you ARE repeating yourself, and again, while you're entitled to do so, the rest of us are equally entitled to point out that we might find it boring to the point of being irritating enough that we respond to it. Which I suppose means you have succeeded in stimulating debate, it just might not be the debate you were aiming for.

Just saying.


I guess some opinions are more qualified than others but some take them more seriously than others. If my opinions annoy anybody "ever so slightly" then I am indeed flattered that my ( oft repeated ) opinions matter to that degree that they must be responded to.

Personally I would ignore them :)

Just saying.

I reserve the right to not have to further explain or justify myself .... Or is that verboten ?

Re: Questions that need to be answered

Post Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:43 am
El Diablo User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 11:01 am
Posts: 12106
Location: The Middle of the Land
nantwichexile wrote:
I guess some opinions are more qualified than others but some take them more seriously than others. If my opinions annoy anybody "ever so slightly" then I am indeed flattered that my ( oft repeated ) opinions matter to that degree that they must be responded to.

Personally I would ignore them :)

Just saying.

I reserve the right to not have to further explain or justify myself .... Or is that verboten ?


I wouldn't be too flattered. I find lots of people annoying who have no particular bearing on my life. It isn't that they must be responded to , per se. It's more that responding to things is what internet forums are all about.

If I ignored every lunatic opinion on here I'd have to stop posting and find sopmething else to do with my time. And I'm feeling far too short on imagination for that.

You can reserve the right to do more or less whatever you want on a web forum, so you have no obligation to explain or justify yourself.
OBN Wannabe
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Backwoodsman, C O Jones, Clearwing, Jrrhino, leedsnsouths, Marty Grrrrrrrrrr!, maurice, rhino phil, tad rhino, WF Rhino and 227 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Leeds Rhinos - southstander.com


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORD (DATE)
4,446,4932,10675,4044,491 (28-03-2016)
Google Analytics Unique Monthly Users : 118,226 (May 2016)
DOWNLOAD OUR ANDROID APP CLICK HERE!
YOUR CLUB : Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
R
L
F
A
N
A
L
Y
T
I
C
S


Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Change these prefs/or turn this off...

FIXTURES/RESULTS

W/D/L DATE COMP HOME AWAY
L Fri 23rd Sep SL STS 32 12 WAK
L Thu 15th Sep SL WAK 12 18 HFC
L Fri 9th Sep SL WAK 10 14 CAT
L Fri 2nd Sep SL CAS 46 22 WAK
L Sun 21st Aug SL WID 40 8 WAK
L Sun 14th Aug SL WAK 10 38 WAR
L Fri 5th Aug SL WIG 60 12 WAK
L Sun 24th Jul SL WAK 20 46 CAS
W Sat 16th Jul SL CAT 28 30 WAK
L Fri 8th Jul SL WIG 22 18 WAK
L Sun 3rd Jul SL WAK 32 44 STS
L Fri 17th Jun SL WAK 6 32 LEE
W Sun 12th Jun SL HUD 2 10 WAK
L Thu 2nd Jun SL WAK 16 54 HKR
L Fri 27th May SL SAL 38 8 WAK
W Sun 22nd May SL WAK 25 24 CAT
W Sun 15th May SL WAK 36 28 WAR
W Sun 8th May CC2016 WAK 40 22 TOU
W Fri 29th Apr SL WID 16 18 WAK
L Sun 24th Apr SL WAK 28 46 HFC
W Fri 15th Apr CC2016 WAK 44 10 SHE
W Sun 10th Apr SL WAK 62 0 WIG
W Sat 2nd Apr SL WAK 32 18 SAL
W Mon 28th Mar SL LEE 16 20 WAK
W Fri 25th Mar SL WAK 36 22 HUD
L Fri 18th Mar SL HFC 22 4 WAK
L Fri 11th Mar SL STS 44 4 WAK
L Sun 6th Mar SL WAK 28 42 CAT
L Fri 26th Feb SL WAR 34 16 WAK
W Sun 21st Feb SL HKR 12 14 WAK
L Sun 14th Feb SL CAS 40 6 WAK
L Sun 7th Feb SL WAK 16 24 WID
Tab two Tab three

Copyrite RLFanalytics 2016
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:00
8s-R7
Batley
v
Salford  
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:00
8s-R7
London
v
Featherstone  
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:00
8s-R8
Bradford
v
Dewsbury  
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:00
8s-R8
Halifax
v
Sheffield  
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:30
SL-R30
Castleford
v
Widnes  
  Sun 25th Sep : 15:30
CH-R25
Barrow
v
Doncaster  
  Thu 29th Sep : 20:00
SL-R31
Warrington
v
St. HelensTV  
  Fri 30th Sep : 20:00
SL-R31
Wigan
v
Hull FCTV