RLFANS.COM Statistics
RLFANS Since : 15th August 2000
Total Registrations : 70,813
Total Posts : 3,455,591
in 134,711 Topics
Record Online : 3,960
on Mon 22nd Apr 2013 @ 8:04PM
Current users online : 799
Welcome
Welcome : Please login or register to use all our features!
AUP | FAQ | User Prefs | Advanced Site Prefences

WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Tick Tock

Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:04 pm
Fully User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 7559
bren2k wrote:
There is a degree of irony in questioning my maturity in the style of a teenage valley girl.

Good luck with the fighting fund to take NM to a judicial review.


Nothing to add to the discussion still then? Says it all.
Image
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:09 pm
TRB User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 9:43 am
Posts: 9488
Location: Wacky Field
Fully wrote:
What have I got wrong? I have never said it will happen. I was merely questioning it based on the previous article. But please do continue your real [im]mature comments.


You said 'it was worth the risk' when it most likely isn't.

You have kept looking for ways in which the process can be delayed.

You refuse to accept that anything not said by RW can be true or that there is anything stopping GH from being built tomorrow.

And you call me immature - you've put me there with your inane comments and lack of reality!

Please, please, stop digging! :PRAY:
"Wakefields Sporting Crusader"

For the latest details on the Stadium for Wakefield campaign, log onto
http://www.swag-online.co.uk
Please feel free to leave a message of support on the board
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:15 pm
Fully User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 7559
But you woefully neglect the rest of the sentence just to suit your pathetic personal digs at me. If you re-read, I think you'll find the words "if", which suggests that there has to be a chance it is a risk worth paying if it can come off and was in direct response to I_A's post previously, which states "it's a big risk for a private individual." If there is no chance, then no, there isn't any point really.

I refuse to accept anything said by Wakefield fans who know absolutely zip about GH or inside GH other than rumours and forum posts. There is nothing stopping GH except money. If we had money, it would have been built or would be built. It seems to be you that cannot grasp that fact.

Please, please return to the discussion and stop focusing on your personal attentions of me.
Last edited by Fully on Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:16 pm
bren2k User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:32 pm
Posts: 9127
Location: Ossett
Fully wrote:
Nothing to add to the discussion still then? Says it all.


There is no discussion; you're desperately looking for ways that the process could be delayed and you've been told that there aren't any.
Image

Spartans RLFC

Follow us on Twitter @spartansRLFC
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:18 pm
Fully User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 7559
bren2k wrote:
There is no discussion; you're desperately looking for ways that the process could be delayed and you've been told that there aren't any.


Well, actually I_A said differently if you re-read his post. He said that it may only serve as delaying the inevitable. But seems you totally disregarded the thread for your pure attempt to have a dig at me.
Image
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:20 pm
imwakefieldtillidie User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 1321
Fully wrote:
Well, actually I_A said differently if you re-read his post. He said that it may only serve as delaying the inevitable. But seems you totally disregarded the thread for your pure attempt to have a dig at me.


Troll.
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:22 pm
Fully User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 7559
imwakefieldtillidie wrote:
Troll.


Hardly. I'm asking questions based on the contents of others' posts. I am not looking or searching for bites.
Image
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:26 pm
imwakefieldtillidie User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:56 pm
Posts: 1321
Fully wrote:
Hardly. I'm asking questions based on the contents of others' posts. I am not looking or searching for bites.


You're a troll. Get back on your own board.
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:40 pm
inside man User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 5:06 pm
Posts: 1568
Fully wrote:
But you woefully neglect the rest of the sentence just to suit your pathetic personal digs at me. If you re-read, I think you'll find the words "if", which suggests that there has to be a chance it is a risk worth paying if it can come off and was in direct response to I_A's post previously, which states "it's a big risk for a private individual." If there is no chance, then no, there isn't any point really.

I refuse to accept anything said by Wakefield fans who know absolutely zip about GH or inside GH other than rumours and forum posts. There is nothing stopping GH except money. If we had money, it would have been built or would be built. It seems to be you that cannot grasp that fact.

Please, please return to the discussion and stop focusing on your personal attentions of me.

Nothing to stop me ruling the world tommorow either, just need all the money in the world and it will be mine I tell you all mine! Bit like your logic for GH you fool.
Post Tue Jun 19, 2012 4:41 pm
charlie User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2001 12:04 pm
Posts: 3038
Location: Wakefield
Bloody government, they think they own the place
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests

Quick Reply

   

Return to Wakefield Trinity Wildcats



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM
 
Sponsors