Erm...it wasn't daft at all - I take insult to that. It was a factual post, which is true. Any stadium thread on here is jumped on by Wakey fans - you should know that by now.
Sorry thats not right, its only the ones where you talk twaddle and to be fair that sounds like you having a right hissy fit!! MAN UP FULLY!!!! (there's a lucrative t-shirt opportunity there for anyone savvy enough!!)
Mint Catering Solutions Ltd. "The practical catering people" http://mintcateringsolutions.co.uk/ Catering & Vending Management. Auditing & Benchmarking. Training & Development.
Status: ONLINE Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:48 pm Posts: 1150 Location: Hiding behind a palm tree in the mountains
Tigerade wrote:
The "teacher" returns ?
I hope you're not implying I'm that "teacher" of many user names? How very dare you? (check the joined date & also posting at 2.30 am on a school night?) Just trying to clear up the misunderstanding of fully's post.
*********************** ROLL OF HONOUR ******************* *********** League***************************** CUP ************
2008 ****** mwildcat ************************ no competition ******* 2009 ****** mwildcat ************************ no competition ******* 2010 ***** Yorkshireone ********************* devil's advocate ******* 2011 ******* LG83 *************************** I'mWakefieldTillIDie ***** 2012 * t drednowts is cumin/cheshirecat57 *** adelaide-giant.no9 ***** 2013 ????????????????????????????????????????????????? Inilah Wakefield.Bersama kita lebih kuat.
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:49 am Posts: 1192 Location: Behind the sticks -Both halves
Tigerade wrote:
The "teacher" returns ?
You are confusing him with "G.PriceSandalWildcatTrinitarianWF2FanClub"
"Castleford's biggest home crowd of the 1991-1992 season wasn't quite 12,000 while on average they'd sit around 6000 but the noise, the chanting and the singing just blows you away" - Tawera Nikau "Standing Tall"
"I can tell you the atmosphere was extraordinary at Wheldon Road on big days. The ground held around 15,000 people, every one of them close to the action on the field and the noise would be enough to send a rumble through the town" - Malcolm Reilly "Reilly - A Life in Rugby League"
I hope you're not implying I'm that "teacher" of many user names? How very dare you? (check the joined date & also posting at 2.30 am on a school night?) Just trying to clear up the misunderstanding of fully's post.
i can vouch for THIS teacher not being THAT teacher (sorry didn't pick up on that earlier). THIS teacher is a little less local?
Mint Catering Solutions Ltd. "The practical catering people" http://mintcateringsolutions.co.uk/ Catering & Vending Management. Auditing & Benchmarking. Training & Development.
Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 2:28 pm Posts: 3374 Location: Outside your remit
Scabbycat wrote:
Wakefield's ground is a joke. A stand behind the posts with roofing only covering 2/3rd. There are about 8 steel girders with some corregated sheeting on top. Down one side of the ground there is a similar amateurish erection about 30 yards long. If Glover was the rich man he purported to be why didnt he do the job properly. They probably wont get planning permission for the new ground anyway because of all the objections by Leeds City Council Residents. Doubtful whether Wakefield Met woulld allow two grounds to be built so close to each other. Castleford already have full pllanning permission,Highways would have to be involved to create access from M62. Wakefield may have plans for a new ground but it won't be at Newmarket.
May I recommend the hard cheese to go with your sour grapes sir??
On the topic of GH though, hopefully if these rumours of Tricky Dicky being usurped are true then the process may be speeded up, would be great to have 2 quality stadiums in the district. Best of luck!
Naaa na na na na na naaaa, na na na na.... Wakefield!
2 posts on topic in the space of nearly a full page, do you people ever learn?
Thread closed, sorry castigersdave if you want to make a new thread about it feel free to do so - anyone who wants to post in it only on topic posts please.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, the RLSA (Rugby League Supporters Association) or the 100% League Network is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites, please email the author of this sub-site if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2013 RLFANS.COM