Board index ‹ Super League ‹ Wakefield Trinity Wildcats ‹ Liam Watts! Opinions

http://www.thisishullandeastriding.co.u ... /story.htm

States that we are interested with Agar keen to bring him back to his west Yorkshire roots! Bit of a loose cannon from what I've heard easily led into doing stupid things!Is it a good idea pairing him with cockayne after their arrest? No doubt a good player but would he do a job for us and do we want him??

If Amor goes to Leeds, and as along as there is a similar clause to his contract then Ben Cockayne had, then I wouldn't say no.

I'd take him in a heartbeat. Complete Nutball but agar takes no prisoners re discipline and behaviour. Big hard strong running prop who has a heel of a lot of potential

Just hope Amor stays we should have signed him when leeds werent arsed we should of snapped him up without having a daft deal !!

Willzay wrote:

If Amor goes to Leeds, and as along as there is a similar clause to his contract then Ben Cockayne had, then I wouldn't say no.

A clause saying he can't socialise with Cockayne would be adequate.

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

A clause saying he can't socialise with Cockayne would be adequate.

Lol isn't that breach of basic human rights!

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

A clause saying he can't socialise with Cockayne would be adequate.

I'll have pint of what your having

If he were to come and knuckle down like Ben has then It would be a good signing.

Would be a cracking signing in my opinion. Not the brightest, but if you picked a RL team on intelligence you would be struggling to put a side out!

Tough lad, who doesnt take a backward step.

Get him and Amor and i would be happy. Dont know if Kyle is going to stay, but i would bet if he goes back to Leeds he will be on the move again a year after. He would be in and out of the side at Headingley like Griffin, Moore, Kirke and Pitts (was).

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:

A clause saying he can't socialise with Cockayne would be adequate.

A WASBO clause?