WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - RD 21 | Leeds Rhinos v Wakefield Trinity

Board index Qualifiers Eights Leeds Rhinos - southstander.com RD 21 | Leeds Rhinos v Wakefield Trinity

Posted by REDWHITEANDBLUE on Sat Jul 14, 2018 12:17 pm
REDWHITEANDBLUE User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 6
Rep Position: 29th / 77,216

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 8:31 pm
Posts: 3515
DHM wrote:
What's the point of a video ref. Clearly knocked on then didn't ground the ball anyway - no matter how many times it was reviewed - yet the on field decision of an unsighted ref carried more weight. I'm sick of this on field decision rubbish. It's a try or it's not a try. If the on field official has to have it reviewed then he clearly is guessing to begin with.

It's also worth noting that the two points that drew them level came after Walker had the ball punched out of his arms and should have been a Leeds penalty. But of course if Ferres hadn't given away yet another dumb penalty that wouldn't have mattered.


You will have also have seen the third Leeds try should never have been given and it was a clear knock on by Hall that the ref gave a strip for. The penalty near your line against PP was a joke. Swings and roundabouts open both eyes but for the post you got a point just!
[IMG]//i50.tinypic.com/a59ff5.gif[/IMG]
Posted by christopher on Sat Jul 14, 2018 12:40 pm
christopher User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 9:13 am
Posts: 7048
Location: Sydney NSW
REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:
You will have also have seen the third Leeds try should never have been given and it was a clear knock on by Hall that the ref gave a strip for. The penalty near your line against PP was a joke. Swings and roundabouts open both eyes but for the post you got a point just!



Wasnt the hall ‘strip’ in the second half? And he gave it for interferance not a strip, unless im thinking about a different one.

Why should the 3rd leeds try never have been given?
Posted by Neruda on Sat Jul 14, 2018 12:41 pm
Neruda User avatar
Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 77,216

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:00 pm
Posts: 297
REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:
You will have also have seen the third Leeds try should never have been given and it was a clear knock on by Hall that the ref gave a strip for. The penalty near your line against PP was a joke. Swings and roundabouts open both eyes but for the post you got a point just!

what was wrong with the third try?
Posted by leedscat on Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:14 pm
leedscat Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:18 pm
Posts: 662
Neruda wrote:
what was wrong with the third try?

Moon obstucted lynne from getting to handley before it was too late the linesman stood his ground and called it but hicks couldnt wait to give the try had he gone to screen it would been disallowed well it should of been
Posted by DHM on Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:40 pm
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8562
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
REDWHITEANDBLUE wrote:
You will have also have seen the third Leeds try should never have been given and it was a clear knock on by Hall that the ref gave a strip for. The penalty near your line against PP was a joke. Swings and roundabouts open both eyes but for the post you got a point just!


What I saw for Leeds third try was Moon passing the ball and then carrying on his running line - what's he supposed to do? Disappear? He made no attempt to obstruct anyone and he's perfectly entitles to carry on running his line anyway as he was carrying the ball - happens all the time in open play. And anyway that's a judgment call, a player clearly not grounding the ball after clearly knocking it on is a matter of fact.

What's the Hall penalty got to do with anything? If you are going to get nit picky about every decision then Leeds should have had a penalty when Walker clearly had the ball deliberately punched out of his arms. But no, it was a scrum and a couple of plays later you got the penalty that leveled the match.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Posted by DHM on Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:42 pm
DHM User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Posts: 8562
Location: Garth's Darkplace.
leedscat wrote:
Moon obstucted lynne from getting to handley before it was too late the linesman stood his ground and called it but hicks couldnt wait to give the try had he gone to screen it would been disallowed well it should of been


Nonsense.
"Well, I think in Rugby League if you head butt someone there's normally some repercusions"
Posted by Tricky2309 on Sat Jul 14, 2018 2:52 pm
Tricky2309 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 77,216

Quiz Score: 56

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 4004
DHM wrote:
Nonsense.


Nope. Handley ran behind moon who prevented lyne from making the tackle. You shouldn’t even been in the position in any event cos ferres trapped lynes arm in the tackle and Hicks gave you a penalty
Posted by tad rhino on Sat Jul 14, 2018 3:01 pm
tad rhino User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 1:46 pm
Posts: 20880
Location: in bed between halle berry and jennifer aniston
it shouldn't have been a penalty but you got a scrum when the ball was knocked out of walkers hands. you scored off it. but obstruction? no
Posted by Tricky2309 on Sat Jul 14, 2018 3:06 pm
Tricky2309 User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 77,216

Quiz Score: 56

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:03 pm
Posts: 4004
tad rhino wrote:
it shouldn't have been a penalty but you got a scrum when the ball was knocked out of walkers hands. you scored off it. but obstruction? no


The Walker one hicks said it got knocked out in the act of making the tackle. The ball steal on hall was a clear knock on and enabled you to get out to an 8 point lead.

As for obstruction, there was enough in it for the touch judge to suggest it be sent to the VR. Hicks could have ruled a try on the field if he thought it was but sent it up to make sure given his touch judge advice.
Posted by christopher on Sat Jul 14, 2018 4:03 pm
christopher User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 9:13 am
Posts: 7048
Location: Sydney NSW
Tricky2309 wrote:
The Walker one hicks said it got knocked out in the act of making the tackle. The ball steal on hall was a clear knock on and enabled you to get out to an 8 point lead.

As for obstruction, there was enough in it for the touch judge to suggest it be sent to the VR. Hicks could have ruled a try on the field if he thought it was but sent it up to make sure given his touch judge advice.



As stated I don’t think the hall one was a ball steal he gave it for interference at the ruck.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ALAW, Emagdnim13, Fieldheadrhino, Gotcha, Jrrhino, Maverick Rhino, taxi4stevesmith, The Eagle and 211 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Leeds Rhinos - southstander.com


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,796,0971,61677,2164,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
 Full Time (Hover Score) 
NRL
MELBOURNE STORM
22-6
CRONULLA
TODAY 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
CASTLEFORD
v
WAKEFIELD
TOMORROW 10:40
NRL
SYDNEY ROOSTERS
v
SOUTHS
TOMORROW 15:00
 CH ONE
COVENTRY BEARS
v
HUNSLET
TOMORROW 15:00
 CH ONE
LONDON SKOLARS
v
OLDHAM
TOMORROW 15:00
 SL8s
LONDON BRONCOS
v
SALFORD
TOMORROW 15:15
SUPER LEAGUE
WARRINGTON
v
ST. HELENS
TOMORROW 17:00
SUPER LEAGUE
HULL FC
v
CATALAN DRAGONS
TOMORROW 17:00
 SL8s
TOULOUSE
v
HULL KR
TOMORROW 17:30
 SL8s
TORONTO
v
WIDNES VIKINGS
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)