Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:44 pm  

Upanunder wrote:

He was stood to the right when Randell received the ball at ahb from Kirmo, right in the f00kin way, but that's what he's paid to do, right?.
I mean, he could have stayed down and not interfered, but no, he's gonna stand up right there because that's how wakey are set up for the next play.
Randell tried to go around the front of him but the play was already fuxxed up by 2 instances of interference, he feigned a pass to Grix, I say feigned because it clearly wasn't designed to be a pinpoint pass, it was designed to sort the 5h1t out one way or the other, and it did.
Whether it was or wasn't "cheating" seems besides the point, I know anything short of an 8 point penalty try for wigan will leave you giving it the big boo hoo's but back in the real World, Lockjaw was doing all the 8u1151t, were it not for his interference both in the tackle and at the pob, nobody would have been chucking the ball at him.
He spun the wheel against the odds and lost that one, but not the game, eh

That’s a very vivid imagination you’ve got!!

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Tue Mar 13, 2018 7:46 pm  

Upanunder wrote:

He was stood to the right when Randell received the ball at ahb from Kirmo, right in the f00kin way, but that's what he's paid to do, right?.
I mean, he could have stayed down and not interfered, but no, he's gonna stand up right there because that's how wakey are set up for the next play.
Randell tried to go around the front of him but the play was already fuxxed up by 2 instances of interference, he feigned a pass to Grix, I say feigned because it clearly wasn't designed to be a pinpoint pass, it was designed to sort the 5h1t out one way or the other, and it did.
Whether it was or wasn't "cheating" seems besides the point, I know anything short of an 8 point penalty try for wigan will leave you giving it the big boo hoo's but back in the real World, Lockjaw was doing all the 8u1151t, were it not for his interference both in the tackle and at the pob, nobody would have been chucking the ball at him.
He spun the wheel against the odds and lost that one, but not the game, eh

That’s a very vivid imagination you’ve got... but still complete and utter rubbish!

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Tue Mar 13, 2018 8:23 pm  

Bigredwarrior wrote:

That’s a very vivid imagination you’ve got... but still complete and utter rubbish!

That's me told then...

*shoots off to imagine something else whilst its still vivid and rubbish*

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Tue Mar 13, 2018 9:09 pm  

Upanunder wrote:

He was stood up blocking any play to the right.
Can't always get out the way I know but...seriously, he knew what he was doing just like he knew what he was doing with his hand " trapped" lol, as if.
I don't actually care which of those was penalized, but not doing anything about either of them didn't look like a option tbh.
Can't imagine what he spent so much time flappin his lips at the ref about, but that's the refs fault for being a pu55y I suppose.
I thought Wigan played a decent game, they needed to and they needed to get a few key decisions, some deserved some not, but that's the way it goes, so no complaints about the result, they inched out a tough 2 points there I reckon.

No he wasnt, he was behind play, the ball could easily have been passed without hitting lockers.

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Wed Mar 14, 2018 12:02 am  

JonnyBroad wrote:

No he wasnt, he was behind play, the ball could easily have been passed without hitting lockers.

Exactly, and for Lockers to have got back onside, he would have had to move into the line of play first.

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:15 pm  

Upanunder wrote:

That's me told then...

*shoots off to imagine something else whilst its still vivid and rubbish*

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:49 pm  

Upanunder wrote: He was stood to the right when Randell received the ball at ahb from Kirmo, right in the f00kin way, but that's what he's paid to do, right?. I mean, he could have stayed down and not interfered, but no, he's gonna stand up right there because that's how wakey are set up for the next play. Randell tried to go around the front of him but the play was already fuxxed up by 2 instances of interference, he feigned a pass to Grix, I say feigned because it clearly wasn't designed to be a pinpoint pass, it was designed to sort the 5h1t out one way or the other, and it did. Whether it was or wasn't "cheating" seems besides the point, I know anything short of an 8 point penalty try for wigan will leave you giving it the big boo hoo's but back in the real World, Lockjaw was doing all the 8u1151t, were it not for his interference both in the tackle and at the pob, nobody would have been chucking the ball at him. He spun the wheel against the odds and lost that one, but not the game, eh Even google translate couldn’t make head nor tail of this. I’m sure there is a point of view in there somewhere, any chance of an English version? This may help: http://www.dictionary.com

Upanunder wrote: He was stood to the right when Randell received the ball at ahb from Kirmo, right in the f00kin way, but that's what he's paid to do, right?. I mean, he could have stayed down and not interfered, but no, he's gonna stand up right there because that's how wakey are set up for the next play. Randell tried to go around the front of him but the play was already fuxxed up by 2 instances of interference, he feigned a pass to Grix, I say feigned because it clearly wasn't designed to be a pinpoint pass, it was designed to sort the 5h1t out one way or the other, and it did. Whether it was or wasn't "cheating" seems besides the point, I know anything short of an 8 point penalty try for wigan will leave you giving it the big boo hoo's but back in the real World, Lockjaw was doing all the 8u1151t, were it not for his interference both in the tackle and at the pob, nobody would have been chucking the ball at him. He spun the wheel against the odds and lost that one, but not the game, eh Even google translate couldn’t make head nor tail of this. I’m sure there is a point of view in there somewhere, any chance of an English version? This may help: http://www.dictionary.com

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Wed Mar 14, 2018 7:53 pm  

I think the ref has to be better on this. Either SOL is deemed as interfering and the penalty is given before the hooker picks the ball up or it is deemed that SOL has done enough to put himself in a position where he is not interfering and the hooker is penalised for gamesmanship.

I’d love to know what wa said between Sheens and Ganson over the MM one.

From our point of view at least it wasn’t crucial and didn’t make any difference to the result unlike the MM one.

Re: The Lockers offside penalty : Wed Mar 14, 2018 11:35 pm  

the fact the wakey player practically burst out laughing when the penalty was given indicates intent. 100% a penalty to wigan, however lockers was malling about a bit too much for me too so I can see why it was given on this occasion.