Actually it's 0.0022222222%.....but regardless of it it was a whole 2% or not, the point is a valid one. The income from away fans is minimal and should not be relied upon by any club..... as for a 10k gate, 10k x 11 home games then 3 more in the 8's is just over 2 million quid at 15 quid a pop....ad that to SKY cash and you're at 4 million......add shirts, merch and booze to that and there you have your 4.5 mill........10k gates are the minimum needed to break even
Ok, I'll do this slowly. Start off with £4.5m, and £450k is a 10th of that, or 10%. Take a 10th of that again, and you get to £45k, which is then 1% of £4.5m. £10k is around a 5th of £45k, which is then around 0.2% or so of the original £4.5m.
What you've done now is compare the income from home spectators at 14 games with the income from away spectators at a single game. The fact is that income from away fans still has significance when taken across the board. It's not a major income stream, but it's certainly not "minimal". It's around £140k a season taking the £10k figure for each game.
JESUS WEPT HOW MANY TIMES????? £20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000. The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.
There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them.
How non-patronising of you, especially as you are clinging to a minimal amount of money in terms of running the club.
Let us say that 3,000 away fans pay 15 quid each...that is 45k...or 1% of the overall running costs of the home club....sky on the other hand deliver 1.8 million and change or 40% of the clubs running costs.....the question here is not whether I pressed the correct button on my calculator, but rather if SKY would prefer for the competition to have a a wider reach and therefore become more attractive to advertisers who in turn might be expected to pay a little more to SY for access to that audience, do we say no, based on a paltry 1% (and you and I know it is far less than that) and risk the 40% being further reduced? BT, for all the bluster of "could have bid" have little interest in RL and are firmly in bed with soccer and Union and our ratings have now been overtaken by Darts, so SKY, who have already shown their disdain for us by both insisting on Thursday nights (decimating your away fans theory) and getting the rights to the championship to keep them locked away, would appear to be the only player prepared to pay us the 20 mill a year that currently props up the sport across the UK as a pro entity.....but you'd have us reject Toulouse, Toronto, London or anyone else because your club might be a few bob worse off Successful clubs treat away fans as an added bonus.....Wigan, Leeds, Hull FC, Wire and Saints can all comfortably survive on their Season Ticket holders, Castleford (2017 version) and Catalans are close but HKR, Leigh, Huddersfield, Widnes, Salford and Wakefield are all running on the smell of an oily rag or at the benevolence of a sugar daddy....pull sky from them and see if they give a flying one about 1,000 travelling fans.
Halifax, Featherstone, London, Toulouse, Leigh and Toronto will fight it out in 2018 and if we are correct that we are heading for 14 the following year, I'd take the French and the Canadians now, because 2 more pit villages playing what the country perceive to be a localised version of the bigger code isn't headline news and won't have a better class of sponsor or a larger TV deal banging at our doors.....and Halifax fans can travel to Post office Road and you can lament that the 4k fans there would have been 14k if only you were in SL.......
This isn't specifically about my my team. Fax aren't set up for SL at the moment, and maybe never will be, but imo there should always be a path to elevate a team if and when they're ready (on and off the field) regardless of where they are
Btw, you've done it again, and compare the proceeds from away supporters at one game with a full season's sky money. Let's just reverse that for a moment. Taking your new figure of £45k, that's £630k income from away fans across 14 games, whereas Sky "only" contribute £129k per game. Comparing like for like, it's £45k versus £129k, which rather makes your original 0.00000022% claim somewhat bizarre.
Oh, and I'm not "rejecting" Toulouse, Toronto and London, as you put it, just saying that they should gain their place in SL on the field of play, probably with accompanying off-field criteria, so long as the same rules apply to everyone without any favouritism.
Patronising maybe I was, but please make sure you're comparing apples with apples.
How non-patronising of you, especially as you are clinging to a minimal amount of money in terms of running the club.
Let us say that 3,000 away fans pay 15 quid each...that is 45k...or 1% of the overall running costs of the home club....sky on the other hand deliver 1.8 million and change or 40% of the clubs running costs.....the question here is not whether I pressed the correct button on my calculator, but rather if SKY would prefer for the competition to have a a wider reach and therefore become more attractive to advertisers who in turn might be expected to pay a little more to SY for access to that audience, do we say no, based on a paltry 1% (and you and I know it is far less than that) and risk the 40% being further reduced? BT, for all the bluster of "could have bid" have little interest in RL and are firmly in bed with soccer and Union and our ratings have now been overtaken by Darts, so SKY, who have already shown their disdain for us by both insisting on Thursday nights (decimating your away fans theory) and getting the rights to the championship to keep them locked away, would appear to be the only player prepared to pay us the 20 mill a year that currently props up the sport across the UK as a pro entity.....but you'd have us reject Toulouse, Toronto, London or anyone else because your club might be a few bob worse off Successful clubs treat away fans as an added bonus.....Wigan, Leeds, Hull FC, Wire and Saints can all comfortably survive on their Season Ticket holders, Castleford (2017 version) and Catalans are close but HKR, Leigh, Huddersfield, Widnes, Salford and Wakefield are all running on the smell of an oily rag or at the benevolence of a sugar daddy....pull sky from them and see if they give a flying one about 1,000 travelling fans.
Halifax, Featherstone, London, Toulouse, Leigh and Toronto will fight it out in 2018 and if we are correct that we are heading for 14 the following year, I'd take the French and the Canadians now, because 2 more pit villages playing what the country perceive to be a localised version of the bigger code isn't headline news and won't have a better class of sponsor or a larger TV deal banging at our doors.....and Halifax fans can travel to Post office Road and you can lament that the 4k fans there would have been 14k if only you were in SL.......
All of which is difficult to argue with.
What has been popular with our paymaster, these past three seasons is the added ingredient of jeopardy, brought about by the 'Middle 8' concept, at the end of the season. Previously, I can't believe SKY, or the viewers have been too excited at the number of 'non-games', televised at the latter end of a season, featuring teams who have long since 'given up' on achieving anything. (Huddersfield were a prime example of such a team, prior to the Middle 8's) One or two of the pit villages have given our paymasters something of value for their support, in that competition.
Also, how excited would SKY/their subscribers feel, about games with little or no atmosphere, where the visiting supporters are counted in their teens? The 1,000 visiting fans, whilst not contributing hugely to the finances of the home club, do contribute to the atmosphere of the occasion, for both the 'live' audience and the one on TV. Boost that to the 3,000 that Leigh(for example) took to Wigan, or the similar number Saints brought to Leigh, and that contributes enormously to the excitement of the occasion and therefore, to the subscriber..
During my many years of watching our great sport, I have seen many attempts at expansion fail. That's not to say, with the support of wealthy backers in North America, it will fail this time. But if/when it succeeds over there, are the North American backers/clubs going to want to continue with fixtures against our 'big boys' such as Leeds, Wigan, Saints, and Hull - all of whom are 'small fry' in comparison the the huge North American cities - or are they going to break free and form their own 'parochial' North American League/Conference?
JESUS WEPT HOW MANY TIMES????? £20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000. The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.
There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them.
Btw, you've done it again, and compare the proceeds from away supporters at one game with a full season's sky money. Let's just reverse that for a moment. Taking your new figure of £45k, that's £630k income from away fans across 14 games, whereas Sky "only" contribute £129k per game. Comparing like for like, it's £45k versus £129k, which rather makes your original 0.00000022% claim somewhat bizarre.
Nice massaging of statistics......Put really simply....because you like being condescending...13 away trips for 1,000 fans of club A delivers 195,000 in ticket revenue to the entire league system of 14 sides. 14 Clubs running at an operating cost of a combined 63 million pounds shouldn't really be worried about replacing club A with a club delivering nothing in ticket revenue. Sky pay 19 million a change a year for the rights.....
Which is the bigger number? Is it 63 MILLION.......19 MILLION or 195k?
Your maths is really shocking. 6000 away fans per week in a 12 team SL at £20 = £1.8 at the gate against let's say £20m from sky, so if £60m is the cost of 12 clubs then away fans equate to 3% of income assuming none buy a beer etc Ask any fan of most competitive sports and the buzz around a big away following makes the event far more enjoyable. We need at least 3 French clubs plus Toronto in an expanded 2 Division FT super league structure with p&r
JESUS WEPT HOW MANY TIMES????? £20 a ticket and £15 on beer and merchandise.....so an away fan is worth £35. At best, 1,000 is the average away support split across 11 rounds and I am being really generous here, so Toronto, replacing say Wakefield will cost a SL club £35,000. The minimum turnover of a SL club is £4,000,000 so Toronto instead of Widnes is worth less than 1% of a SL clubs turnover.
There are many valid reasons for and against expansion into America, but "AWAY FANS" isn't one of them.
I really can't take a person whose username suggests they are an egomaniac seriously at all.
1. The maths are right...because you don't agree doesn't make them any less right! 1,000 fans at £15 a ticket delivers a club £15,000 all year.......remove that club and its 1,000 fans and replace with a club with no fans and the cost to your club is £15,000.
2. The name is ironic.....I'm no megalomaniac and I would say that actually know far less about RL than most posters on here, but I do know sports marketing. The game needs to decide what it wants to be.....a small localised sport with 10 or a dozen sides attracting a 10k average gate and getting £20,000,000 a year from the TV company.....or a National/International heavy hitter attracting top name sponsorship and TV companies fighting for rights. If it's the first, then jettison Catalans and Toronto, retreat to the heartlands and grow the game there. If its the second, the some very tough decisions will need to be made and some peoples clubs will be culled.....what is becoming more evident is that trying to be both at the same time just isn't working.
maurice wrote:
Your maths is really shocking. 6000 away fans per week in a 12 team SL at £20 = £1.8 at the gate against let's say £20m from sky, so if £60m is the cost of 12 clubs then away fans equate to 3% of income assuming none buy a beer etc
My maths is fine and was based around the average ticket being 15 notes and the number of fans 1,000. Those 1,000 fans contribute 13 attendances in a 14 team league (see thread title) ergo, £15,000 (revenue) x 13 (games) = £195,000. If this team is say, Widnes and we replace them with say, Toronto, then the cost in lost revenue to each club is £15,000 or a collective £195,000....nobody is saying replace 4 sides with 4 unsupported sides, but even if they were, it would cost a collective £790k a year and possibly open up a US TV deal worth far more.....NYC v Toronto is of interest to ESPN, Disney, Warner or any other major TV players.
maurice wrote:
Ask any fan of most competitive sports and the buzz around a big away following makes the event far more enjoyable.
The competition has 2 main draw cards who were involved in the top 10 attended games last year.....Wigan and Leeds. Hull FC v HKR may well break into that statistic this year.....but Castleford v Wakefield averaged 8,500 for their 2 "derby" games in the regular season last year.......and Castleford v Wakefield isn't of interest to ESPN, Disney, Warner or any other major TV players......Widnes v St Helens the week after Easter in 2017 attracted 6,171 fans.....the clubs are less than 9 miles apart FFS.......and as for Wigan v Leigh...the 2 clubs combined average in 2017 was 20,500, yet 4,500 couldn't be bothered travelling the 9 miles last year for the game at the DW..........the "buzz" of away fans doesn't pay the bills!
maurice wrote:
We need at least 3 French clubs plus Toronto in an expanded 2 Division FT super league structure with p&r
....and who will pay for it? Toulouse play in front of 2,000 fans in a 4k capacity barn and are the second best RL supported team after Catalans who get 9k....where is this imaginary third side and who will watch/back them? If your dream of 2 divisions of 10 with P&R and the 20 sides being FT is to ever happen, then either one of the two Items I have highlighted has to go.....because be assured that Toronto's backer will not fathom the idea of being relegated once he's invested heavily and neither will the Gym teacher from Huddersfield with his £36 million over 3 years in NYC.....
I thought the discussion was away support income v total income? Not the impact of one clubs away support being replaced by one with no away support on the total income of the comp
Wigan v Leigh, provided Wigans second best league crowd after Saints, on an appalling night weather wise - Higher than Wire or Leeds
What did UTC draw prior to Catalans being formed, doubt it was 2k. SL in Toulouse wouldn't be played in the current stadium, they have a few other options.
Avignon have drawn far 14k plus for intl RL in recent years and would be a regionally formed club on the lines of the Dragons
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 298 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...