WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - GAME ON : Hull FC v Wigan Warriors - 20:00:00

Board index Welcome to RLFANS The Virtual Terrace GAME ON : Hull FC v Wigan Warriors - 20:00:00

Posted by secondstanza on Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:46 pm
secondstanza Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:40 am
Posts: 258
number 6 wrote:
looks like your all thick and unable to read

http://www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/disciplinary

read(if you can) calisle then sickinotes

late hit on a kicker is a yellow unless its captain sicknote


Didn't the disciplinary say the initial contact was with an open hand and to the chest?

Are are the disciplinary only correct when you approve of what they say?
Posted by number 6 on Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:49 pm
number 6 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 6:46 pm
Posts: 10775
secondstanza wrote:
Didn't the disciplinary say the initial contact was with an open hand and to the chest?

Are are the disciplinary only correct when you approve of what they say?



it reads very similar to me, late hit i assumed was automatic 10

on friday night the officials got it wrong,(probably a reason the game got like it did in the first half)
Posted by secondstanza on Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:54 pm
secondstanza Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 10:40 am
Posts: 258
From the RFL site;
Obstruction after kick (j) A common form of obstruction occurs when a player, after kicking the ball forward, is tackled or impeded by an opponent. However, a tackler cannot be expected to delay making a tackle because the player in possession might decide to kick the ball. The onus is on the kicker to get his kick in before his opponent commits himself to the tackle.

The ball has been kicked before the opponent commits himself to the tackle. He should be penalised if he obstructs the kicker.
________________

Can't find any mention of an automatic yellow though but if SOL went in after the kick was taken then its a pen.
Posted by Grimmy on Mon Sep 11, 2017 4:00 pm
Grimmy User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 19
Rep Position: 16th / 76,956

Quiz Score: 248

Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:05 pm
Posts: 12952
number 6 wrote:
it reads very similar to me, late hit i assumed was automatic 10

on friday night the officials got it wrong,(probably a reason the game got like it did in the first half)

A late hit isn't an automatic 10, for cases exactly like this one where it would be incredibly soft to sin bin him. The only rules I can think of like that are that professional fouls are an automatic sin bin. Kicking, headbutting and gouging are automatic dismissals. Pretty much everything else is ref's discretion based on severity, intent etc. Obviously with this one it wasn't very severe, and the intent was to charge down the ball. FWIW I agree with the call on the Clubb no try, and that Watts shouldn't have seen red, but this was never worth a yellow.
Frank Zappa wrote:
Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.
Posted by Wigg'n on Mon Sep 11, 2017 6:20 pm
Wigg'n Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 13
Rep Position: 22nd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 80

Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 10:08 am
Posts: 6079
Wilde 3 wrote:
No charge for Liam Watts. The RFL see sense, though probably down to the social media attention from current/ex players about it being the wrong decision.

Thanks to the referee, we have been reduced to 12 men, in a vitally important game that we lost in the last few minutes, due to an incorrect call. Brilliant.


You lost because you had 12 men? Or because you couldn't close out the game? Or because Sneyd's tackling is poop? Or because Shaul knocked on when you had the chance to win the game again?

More convenient to blame someone else though I guess.
Posted by craig hkr on Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:03 pm
craig hkr Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 7:00 pm
Posts: 1474
If Bateman had done the same to Houghton I'm sure Hull fans would still say yellow card ?
Posted by Mr. Zucchini Head on Mon Sep 11, 2017 7:59 pm
Mr. Zucchini Head Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 10
Rep Position: 25th / 76,956

Quiz Score: 8

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 11060
Wigg'n wrote:
You lost because you had 12 men? Or because you couldn't close out the game? Or because Sneyd's tackling is poop? Or because Shaul knocked on when you had the chance to win the game again?

More convenient to blame someone else though I guess.


All of the above, but you cant deny that in a game between two well matched teams, playing for an hour with 12 men is a huge disadvantage, and given the closeness of the game you would have to think Hull would have taken it with a full compliment.
Posted by Trainman on Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:11 pm
Trainman Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 76,956

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 3:59 pm
Posts: 816
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:
All of the above, but you cant deny that in a game between two well matched teams, playing for an hour with 12 men is a huge disadvantage, and given the closeness of the game you would have to think Hull would have taken it with a full compliment.


I'll do you a deal. Give me the Clubb try and a match winning 6 points and you can have your 2 league points from Friday. Given the choice I'd rather have that bit of luck in a CC final than a super 8's game.
Posted by Mild mannered Janitor on Mon Sep 11, 2017 8:58 pm
Mild mannered Janitor User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 1
Rep Position: 34th / 76,956

Quiz Score: 292

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 10:48 pm
Posts: 7394
Location: Here there and everywhere
Wigg'n wrote:
You lost because you had 12 men? Or because you couldn't close out the game? Or because Sneyd's tackling is poop? Or because Shaul knocked on when you had the chance to win the game again?

More convenient to blame someone else though I guess.


Not very comparable is it. One missed tackle, one knock on compared with 60 minutes with 12 men.

More convenient to ignore the completely obvious though I guess.

See you at Old Trafford ;-)
Nil......Zip.....Nothing....ZERO....0
Posted by Mild mannered Janitor on Mon Sep 11, 2017 9:02 pm
Mild mannered Janitor User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 1
Rep Position: 34th / 76,956

Quiz Score: 292

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 10:48 pm
Posts: 7394
Location: Here there and everywhere
craig hkr wrote:
If Bateman had done the same to Houghton I'm sure Hull fans would still say yellow card ?


Highly unlikely scenario. Houghton has been the Leagues top tackler for the last 5 years as he knows how to tackle, not impersonate Ram Man from masters of the universe.
Nil......Zip.....Nothing....ZERO....0
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrisbaneRhino, JEAN CAPDOUZE, JENKY and 86 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to The Virtual Terrace


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,761,17369276,9564,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
Thu 19th Jul 10:50
NRL
PARRAMATTA EELS
v
CANTERBURY
Thu 19th Jul 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
WIGAN WARRIORS
v
ST. HELENS
Fri 20th Jul 09:00
NRL
CRONULLA
v
CANBERRA
Fri 20th Jul 10:50
NRL
BRISBANE
v
PENRITH
Fri 20th Jul 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
CASTLEFORD
v
HUDDERSFIELD
Fri 20th Jul 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
HULL KR
v
WARRINGTON
Fri 20th Jul 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
LEEDS RHINOS
v
WIDNES VIKINGS
Sat 21st Jul 06:00
NRL
NEWCASTLE
v
GOLD COAST
Sat 21st Jul 08:30
NRL
WESTS TIGERS
v
SOUTHS
Sat 21st Jul 10:30
NRL
NQL COWBOYS
v
ST GEORGE
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)