WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Richard Moore - inconsistency ????

Board index Championship Leigh Centurions Richard Moore - inconsistency ????

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:00 pm
Posted by atomic on Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:00 pm
atomic User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Reputation Points: 15
Rep Position: 20th / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 4847
Alan wrote:
The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!? :wink:


It needs overhauling.It needs something like a point system incorporating in the grading of an offence. Instead of letting players off scot-free,give them 3pts,same with a yellow.Hit 9pts and they automatically miss a game.

Would stop most of the Grade A's going unpunished and players getting away it.
Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:14 pm
Posted by GUBRATS on Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:14 pm
GUBRATS User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 1773
ColD wrote:
I assume that's tongue in cheek, can argue Acton was hard done to but you can hardly compare the 2 incidents

Indeed, you could argue that moores challenge was similar to birds on Reynolds, which went unpunished - so there's your consistency


:wink:

Indeed , Moores challenge was similar , but no contact to the head , unlike Birds that did contact the head , yet he didn't get punished , maybe if Richard had collapsed to the floor and kept his eyes shut , he'd have avoided the yellow card as well
snaivooladniv eht fo thgim eht eraweb
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:02 pm
Posted by Centurino on Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:02 pm
Centurino User avatar
Eddie Hemmings's Wig
Eddie Hemmings's Wig

Reputation Points: 4
Rep Position: 31st / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:44 am
Posts: 234
atomic wrote:
I think there was a little grin from Mcnally as in job done.. :wink:


That's because he was realigning his C1 & C2!
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:43 am
Posted by Zulu01 on Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:43 am
Zulu01 User avatar
Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 6
Rep Position: 29th / 76,864

Quiz Score: 288

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:06 am
Posts: 283
Location: The rough side of Lowton
Absolutely scandalous

Blatent Obstruction

Shoulder Charge

Potential for Injury (They are always going on about that)

Punishment:

Nowt, Zip, Sod All.

Now if Jamie or Gaz had done that - Sine Die - Disgrace, Thug etc.

"What is happening" ???????
'aequo pede propera'
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:07 am
Posted by Harold Rigby Jnr on Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:07 am
Harold Rigby Jnr User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 13
Rep Position: 22nd / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 1969
Location: In't Tap Room
Alan wrote:
The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!? :wink:


It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 am
Posted by Cokey on Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 am
Cokey User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 44
Rep Position: 3rd / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 3900
Location: Across The Universe....... Jai guru deva om - Nothings gonna change my world.
Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.


Unless it's Hock or Acton of course. :wink:
Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:28 pm
Posted by kirkhall on Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:28 pm
kirkhall User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 7
Rep Position: 28th / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 1635
Location: Near Leyth
As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment :evil: :evil:
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't :evil: :evil: :evil:
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !
I keep editing this post :( I've watched the game for 64years this season and I have never seen such a harsh punishment given to any player and, boy have I seen some foul play :shock:
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Posted by Harold Rigby Jnr on Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Harold Rigby Jnr User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 13
Rep Position: 22nd / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 1969
Location: In't Tap Room
kirkhall wrote:
As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment :evil: :evil:
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't :evil: :evil: :evil:
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !


So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:48 pm
Posted by Cokey on Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:48 pm
Cokey User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 44
Rep Position: 3rd / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 3900
Location: Across The Universe....... Jai guru deva om - Nothings gonna change my world.
Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?


Harold,you've already stated the obvious......

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.



:thumb:
Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:03 pm
Posted by Alan on Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:03 pm
Alan Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 29
Rep Position: 8th / 76,864

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 5:39 am
Posts: 10605
Location: Back in Lancashire
A full time regular disciplinary committee, consisting of an owner;(Leigh's) a CEO; (Leigh's) and a coach! (Leigh's of course! :wink: )
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alan Cargill, Bets'y Bulls, Hampo, jeffvickers, Leyther14, Lilfatman, Mookachaka, reffy, The Daddy and 133 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Leigh Centurions


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,734,8341,40376,8644,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
 Full Time (Hover Score) 
NRL
NEWCASTLE
10-48
CRONULLA
 Full Time (Hover Score) 
NRL
WESTS TIGERS
14-10
CANTERBURY
 Full Time  
 CHAMPIONSHIP
TOULOUSE
40-28
LONDON BRONCOS
 Full Time  
WSL
LEEDS W
40-12
CASTLEFORD W
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
HEMEL STAGS
0-68
BRADFORD BULLS
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
CRUSADERS
42-6
COVENTRY BEARS
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
HUNSLET
86-0
WEST WALES
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
KEIGHLEY
26-18
LONDON SKOLARS
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
WHITEHAVEN
26-18
YORK
 Full Time  
 CH ONE
WORKINGTON TOWN
38-18
NEWCASTLE
 Full Time  
 CHAMPIONSHIP
ROCHDALE
12-38
SWINTON LIONS
 Full Time  
 CHAMPIONSHIP
BATLEY BULLDOGS
18-20
DEWSBURY RAMS
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)