Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:00 pm  

Alan wrote:

The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!?

It needs overhauling.It needs something like a point system incorporating in the grading of an offence. Instead of letting players off scot-free,give them 3pts,same with a yellow.Hit 9pts and they automatically miss a game.

Would stop most of the Grade A's going unpunished and players getting away it.

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:14 pm  

ColD wrote:

I assume that's tongue in cheek, can argue Acton was hard done to but you can hardly compare the 2 incidents

Indeed, you could argue that moores challenge was similar to birds on Reynolds, which went unpunished - so there's your consistency

Indeed , Moores challenge was similar , but no contact to the head , unlike Birds that did contact the head , yet he didn't get punished , maybe if Richard had collapsed to the floor and kept his eyes shut , he'd have avoided the yellow card as well

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:02 pm  

atomic wrote:

I think there was a little grin from Mcnally as in job done..

That's because he was realigning his C1 & C2!

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:43 am  

Absolutely scandalous

Blatent Obstruction

Shoulder Charge

Potential for Injury (They are always going on about that)

Punishment:

Nowt, Zip, Sod All.

Now if Jamie or Gaz had done that - Sine Die - Disgrace, Thug etc.

"What is happening" ???????

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:07 am  

Alan wrote:

The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!?

It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 am  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.

Unless it's Hock or Acton of course.

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:28 pm  

As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !
I keep editing this post I've watched the game for 64years this season and I have never seen such a harsh punishment given to any player and, boy have I seen some foul play

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:38 pm  

kirkhall wrote:

As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !

So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:48 pm  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?

Harold,you've already stated the obvious......

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ???? : Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:03 pm  

A full time regular disciplinary committee, consisting of an owner;(Leigh's) a CEO; (Leigh's) and a coach! (Leigh's of course! )