Tigerade wrote:
As I thought then - Glover and WTW adds to the list of sole-ownership clubs in SL.
I wonder if the RFL have any concerns about the way ownership of the game is heading?
Why, the club name is used more than the representetive town or city name, single ownership is the preferred model when using franchising.
Look at the NFL, it's the perfect model for franchising and clubs sometime move ownership and location when failing or financial benefits are possible.
Personally, I don't think it works in British sport, particularly in RLs case, and it certainly doesn't achieve what the franchising was set out to do, create sustainable we'll run clubs.
You sound lik a Bradford fan Pre admin!
