Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 7:54 pm  

vastman wrote:

I suggest you watch again or take off your HKR specs - the Guardian and the YP describe some of Wakefield's tries as "superb" "wonderful" "brilliant" their words not mine andI'd agree, still stay bitter my friend.

Doing my best John McEnroe impersonation - "You cannot be Serious." I have watched the game on our TV channel. If I was a regular reader of these rags, I would question if these so called RL reporters they used yesterday were actually at the game. Are you sure they weren't sneaking a crafty look at the taff v jock rugby yawnion international in one of your hospitality boxes.
Your tries were all gifted by a non existent defensive structure in our team, crap reads by our defence, school boy defending on the fringes, unforced errors, forced passes and a lack of composure. Lauatiti stepping Kelly for an assist on the last try exemplifies what my fellow posters are on about. Rileys outrageous sidestep for his try taking out 3 covering defenders on the touchline was also due to our lack of basic defensive structure. Our lack of defensive intensity also allowed Tim Smith far too much time to play and he had all day to pick his cut out passes and reverses.
It's not bitterness, fella, it's anger and frustration at 2 points gifted by Hull Kr to a hardworking, half decent team who on the day wanted it and deserved it more than we did.

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:12 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Doing my best John McEnroe impersonation - "You cannot be Serious." I have watched the game on our TV channel. If I was a regular reader of these rags, I would question if these so called RL reporters they used yesterday were actually at the game. Are you sure they weren't sneaking a crafty look at the taff v jock rugby yawnion international in one of your hospitality boxes.
Your tries were all gifted by a non existent defensive structure in our team, crap reads by our defence, school boy defending on the fringes, unforced errors, forced passes and a lack of composure. Lauatiti stepping Kelly for an assist on the last try exemplifies what my fellow posters are on about. Rileys outrageous sidestep for his try taking out 3 covering defenders on the touchline was also due to our lack of basic defensive structure. Our lack of defensive intensity also allowed Tim Smith far too much time to play and he had all day to pick his cut out passes and reverses.
It's not bitterness, fella, it's anger and frustration at 2 points gifted by Hull Kr to a hardworking, half decent team who on the day wanted it and deserved it more than we did.

Spot on.

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 8:42 pm  

Quick synopsis of the game, as seen on Hull KR TV. Thank God I didn't go.

We were OK for the first quarter, borderline crap for the next 2 quarters and wading in total cack for the last quarter.

Analysis of key details of our playing performance has been perfectly summarised by my fellow posters in previous posts.

On the evidence of what I have just watched, we had no passion, commitment, structure or awareness. Line speed and ptb was half hearted.

Coaching and conditioning is to blame. Unfamiliarity with each others strengths and weaknesses also partly at fault.

Regarding individuals, Cockayne was very good. Bailey, Boudebza, Green, Sio were good. Carlile, Horne, Mantellato, McCarthy, Salter were pants. The rest barely Ok. It's unfortunate Kelly made 3 errors that led to tries, otherwise he would have run Cockayne close as our best player.

Rob Crossland has promised an in depth review of the performance and has asked for strategies and solutions. Does he come on here? If so, he'll get some accurate pointers as to the priority fixes required.

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:07 pm  

Pickering Red wrote:

Doing my best John McEnroe impersonation - "You cannot be Serious." I have watched the game on our TV channel. If I was a regular reader of these rags, I would question if these so called RL reporters they used yesterday were actually at the game. Are you sure they weren't sneaking a crafty look at the taff v jock rugby yawnion international in one of your hospitality boxes.
Your tries were all gifted by a non existent defensive structure in our team, crap reads by our defence, school boy defending on the fringes, unforced errors, forced passes and a lack of composure. Lauatiti stepping Kelly for an assist on the last try exemplifies what my fellow posters are on about. Rileys outrageous sidestep for his try taking out 3 covering defenders on the touchline was also due to our lack of basic defensive structure. Our lack of defensive intensity also allowed Tim Smith far too much time to play and he had all day to pick his cut out passes and reverses.
It's not bitterness, fella, it's anger and frustration at 2 points gifted by Hull Kr to a hardworking, half decent team who on the day wanted it and deserved it more than we did.

You know all this and you didn't actually go, how patronising can you get, pathetic really.

Truth is Wakefield's second to last try would have graced any cup final - but no not to you - why? - Because you''re a snob who just can't accept that a team supposedly lower down the SL food chain even that yourselves is actually at this very moment plaining great skillfull RL. How mean spirited and how shameful - the RL family I wouldn't pee it.

As for loving genuine people (yep I notice that and it made me ) I say in the words of you know who "You cannot be Serious" you wouldn't know genuine if it got up and bit you.

Still you kid yourself you were by effort and desperation. We on the other hand will hopefully carry on watching Smith, Godinet and big Ali ripping teams apart with their blind passes, scoot and pass or sublime offloads you big wally

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:11 pm  

deslawson wrote:

Spot on.

Take it you didn't actually go either, it's one thing spouting rubbish but it's a whole new level applauding it

I do enjoy this but

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:19 pm  

Some people don't half talk rubbish.if it was Wigan,Warrington or sts scoring some of them try's they would be great try's.but because its wakey who you expected to win and think you are better then them all the try's are down to bad defending and your mistakes nowt to do with wakey playing some good rugby

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:23 pm  

vastman wrote:

Take it you didn't actually go either, it's one thing spouting rubbish but it's a whole new level applauding it

I do enjoy this but

He's right though. Let's see how good you look when you come up against a team that can actually defend.

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:33 pm  

roversmad wrote:

He's right though. Let's see how good you look when you come up against a team that can actually defend.

Ummmm Castleford?

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:36 pm  

Deeencee wrote:

Ummmm Castleford?

18 points in 15 mins? What about Ummmm Castleford?

Re: Wakie game. : Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:40 pm  

roversmad wrote:

18 points in 15 mins? What about Ummmm Castleford?

Haha so going by that they only conceded 6 points in 65 mins quite good defence that lol