Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:54 am  

gingerspice wrote:

He is very dishy this McManus bloke of course for us female supporters looks on a rugby player are very important I mean who wud want to look at 17 hocks

When Hull come to visit, you'll get the opportunity to look at seventeen cocks.

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:58 am  

Sandra The Terrorist wrote:

When Hull come to visit, you'll get the opportunity to look at seventeen cocks.

Ew most of they're players are butt ugly

[Mild Rover]

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:04 am  

gingerspice wrote:

He is very dishy this McManus bloke of course for us female supporters looks on a rugby player are very important I mean who wud want to look at 17 hocks

Oh ginge, you MASSIVE sexist. We're not just pieces of meat to be ogled and pawed. We want to be valued as people, not objects of women's base desires. It demeans us. It's like Sepp Blatter saying women footballers should wear tight shorts - terrible you are.

That went a bit Yoda at the end.

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:07 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

Oh ginge, you MASSIVE sexist. We're not just pieces of meat to be ogled and pawed. We want to be valued as people, not objects of women's base desires. It demeans us. It's like Sepp Blatter saying women footballers should wear tight shorts - terrible you are.

That went a bit Yoda at the end.

Well I'm really sorry MR but when a player loses his shorts on the field for what ever reason it has to be said that we'd much rather it be say a Blake green rather than a Gareth hock although if u tuk hocks head of he's in pretty good shape so yes it does matter

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:10 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

Oh ginge, you MASSIVE sexist. We're not just pieces of meat to be ogled and pawed. We want to be valued as people, not objects of women's base desires. It demeans us. It's like Sepp Blatter saying women footballers should wear tight shorts - terrible you are.

That went a bit Yoda at the end.

Old perve me.

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:13 am  

Seventies red wrote:

:DROOL: Old perve me.

Thank u any bloke saying Otherwise wud be lying

[Mild Rover]

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:20 am  

gingerspice wrote:

Thank u any bloke saying Otherwise wud be lying

Football is good. Ogling attractive women is a guilty pleasure. Best enjoyed seperately though, IMHO. Do people take the H in IMHO to be 'honest' or 'humble'? I meant humble. Anyway, I like cheese and I like chocolate, but not together. Except in chocolate cheesecake. Tied myself in knots now, haven't I? Erm...

Special edition Camembert Kit-Kat? No...

James McManus!

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:26 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

Football is good. Ogling attractive women is a guilty pleasure. Best enjoyed seperately though, IMHO. Do people take the H in IMHO to be 'honest' or 'humble'? I meant humble. Anyway, I like cheese and I like chocolate, but not together. Except in chocolate cheesecake. Tied myself in knots now, haven't I? Erm...

Special edition Camembert Kit-Kat? No...

James McManus!

I don't have guilty pleasures like choc or cheese dont mind a bit now and again can't see NK letting this one go however he could be out answer at full back

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:57 am  

Mild Rover wrote:

Football is good. Ogling attractive women is a guilty pleasure. Best enjoyed seperately though, IMHO. Do people take the H in IMHO to be 'honest' or 'humble'? I meant humble. Anyway, I like cheese and I like chocolate, but not together. Except in chocolate cheesecake. Tied myself in knots now, haven't I? Erm...

Special edition Camembert Kit-Kat? No...

James McManus!

Honest everytime.

Re: James mcmanus? : Thu Jun 28, 2012 1:37 pm  

paul T yopu dont think we need a winger ?