[Kosh]

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:28 pm  

Standee wrote:

I've said it WASN'T Ogre

Fair enough.

Standee wrote:

I know who told me and I trust them more than a bunch of anonymous usernames on a message board.

Which is why you're being asked for the source. Otherwise you're just another anonymous username on a message board spreading a rumour.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:30 pm  

Rock God X wrote:

Or, if you're not prepared to do that, why not keep your fooking mouth shut in the first place?

because it's a discussion/message board, perhaps?

anyway, rumours.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:32 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Which is why you're being asked for the source. Otherwise you're just another anonymous username on a message board spreading a rumour.

indeed, and I have no problem with that, if I named the various people who tell me various things (some things turn out to be true, some otherwise) then I'd soon stop being told anything, and I'd rather that didn't happen, it's awlays interesting to speculate about what is going on at FC, it seems I am the only person getting abuse for it, which seems odd, but it says more about those attempting to abuse me than I ever could.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:35 pm  

Standee wrote:

Kosh wrote:

Which is why you're being asked for the source. Otherwise you're just another anonymous username on a message board spreading a rumour.

indeed, and I have no problem with that, if I named the various people who tell me various things (some things turn out to be true, some otherwise) then I'd soon stop being told anything, and I'd rather that didn't happen, it's awlays interesting to speculate about what is going on at FC, it seems I am the only person getting abuse for it, which seems odd, but it says more about those attempting to abuse me than I ever could.

You're the one slagging off a popular member of the club's staff without backing it up. That says more about you than I ever could.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:36 pm  

carl_spackler wrote:

Given that you've just said you're very pleased with Ellis, just how bad do you think Arundel is to be fairly ambivalent with our signings overall?

Personally, the only losses I'm disappointed with are Manu and Moa if he goes.

How on earth did you come up with that ?...I am very pleased with G.Ellis but not overly ecstatic with Arundel which is true, personally I would have sooner kept developing Turner, I do not think Arundel is bad at all, however nor do I think he is class act yet either, he still has a lot to prove. I would have liked a top class centre to replace Turner although I hope Arundel turns into one.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:36 pm  

Standee wrote:

Rock God X wrote:

Or, if you're not prepared to do that, why not keep your fooking mouth shut in the first place?

because it's a discussion/message board, perhaps?

anyway, rumours.

It's a discussion forum, not an unsubstantiated mud-slinging forum.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:51 pm  

Would anyone be interested in taking Tom burgess off bradfords hands I think he'd be an ideal replacement for ogre

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 7:53 pm  

bozza wrote:

Would anyone be interested in taking Tom burgess off bradfords hands I think he'd be an ideal replacement for ogre

I would take Burgess, I agree he would be an ideal replacement.

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:14 pm  

Going over to Aus with his mother and expected to join Souths.

[Kosh]

Re: Rumours Redux : Fri Jun 08, 2012 8:37 pm  

Standee wrote:

indeed, and I have no problem with that, if I named the various people who tell me various things (some things turn out to be true, some otherwise) then I'd soon stop being told anything, and I'd rather that didn't happen

I understand why people don't name sources. I also understand why people get frustrated when sources aren't named. For that reason on the odd occasion when I get 'inside' information I tend to keep it to myself or discuss it with people I trust via PM. Otherwise it's a lose-lose situation.