WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Proposed rule changes

Board index Super League Wakefield Trinity Proposed rule changes

Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:20 pm
Posted by djcool on Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:20 pm
djcool Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 6
Rep Position: 105th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon May 02, 2005 11:29 am
Posts: 2631
Location: Halifax
Golden point, 8 changes and shot clock, discuss
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:08 pm
Posted by Trojan Horse on Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:08 pm
Trojan Horse Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 11
Rep Position: 100th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 5:56 pm
Posts: 2955
I like the idea of golden point - adds an excitement factor to the regular SL games. Though no mention of what happens if after 2 x 5 min half’s it still remains scoreless.

Not sure what the shot clock is all about.

I think there was mention that free play is no longer a rule now too.
Top six 2005 - Trinity.
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:45 pm
Posted by FSW on Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:45 pm
FSW Stevo's Armpit

Reputation Points: 1
Rep Position: 110th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2017 8:49 am
Posts: 50
Golden point - never! We are not Americans; too stupid to be able to comprehend the concept of a draw and always having to have a binary result.

Interchange numbers are irrelevant as players come and go for HIA's and incidents on report. The idea is ok but no idea how it can be managed.

Don't know what a shot clock is unless its something to measure the power of the shot in the tackle, ultimately pointless.

Why can't we just go back to playing Rugby League.
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:50 pm
Posted by thebeagle on Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:50 pm
thebeagle Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 10
Rep Position: 101st / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2016 12:46 pm
Posts: 440
A ‘shot clock’, I believe, is a limited amount of time available to take for a process.
For example 90 seconds for goal kick etc.
Been trialled in golf, whereby competitors had certain amount of time for a shot. Think it was Dutch Open where I saw it .
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:56 pm
Posted by wrencat1873 on Mon Nov 19, 2018 2:56 pm
wrencat1873 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 215
Rep Position: 9th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 7:28 pm
Posts: 10397
Golden point - just not necessary (apart from cup ties /play off games).
Interchange reduction is fine but with blood bin and head assessment, we wont notice any difference (apart form more blood/head interchanges).
Shot clock - Assuming this is time to take penalties, conversions and drop outs, then, great and well overdue. However, for this to be effective, they will need to find a way of preventing the endless injuries (usually with miraculous recoveries) that accompany these parts of the game.
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:00 pm
Posted by NEtrinity on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:00 pm
NEtrinity User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 32
Rep Position: 79th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 12:55 pm
Posts: 695
Location: Seaton Carew
Apparently,

35 secs to set up scrum

30 for GLDO

100 for conversion

What the penalties are if you don't meet these criteria, who knows?
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:07 pm
Posted by LyndsayGill on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:07 pm
LyndsayGill User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 59
Rep Position: 52nd / 77,341

Quiz Score: 284

Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:27 am
Posts: 1908
Trojan Horse wrote:
I like the idea of golden point - adds an excitement factor to the regular SL games. Though no mention of what happens if after 2 x 5 min half’s it still remains scoreless.

Not sure what the shot clock is all about.

I think there was mention that free play is no longer a rule now too.


The draw will stand.
The mind is like a parachute. If it's not open it won't work. - Frank Zappa
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:57 pm
Posted by bren2k on Mon Nov 19, 2018 3:57 pm
bren2k User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 162
Rep Position: 12th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 6:32 pm
Posts: 14326
Location: Ossett
And yet nothing proposed to deal with the tackle/ruck area; another missed opportunity.
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:03 pm
Posted by Clearwing on Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:03 pm
Clearwing User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 64
Rep Position: 47th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 6752
I'd happily do away with all them changes if the game got to grips with s**t obstructions called by the VR.
"The problem when you play Leeds is that they are a huge 'confidence' side. If you get on top of them, they will cower and go away, but when they get in front their chests puff out and they start whooping as they make tackles. " (Jon Wilkin)

“Leeds just wander around looking like they’re doing nothing” (Jon Wilkin)

"Jon Wilkin's tight pants and coffee shop have not helped him to see the bigger picture or allowed him to get a firm grip on reality." (leeds owl)
Re: Proposed rule changes
Post Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:22 pm
Posted by homme vaste on Mon Nov 19, 2018 4:22 pm
homme vaste User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 147
Rep Position: 13th / 77,341

Quiz Score: 184

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:11 pm
Posts: 921
Location: Tomorrowland
FSW wrote:
Golden point - never! We are not Americans; too stupid to be able to comprehend the concept of a draw and always having to have a binary result.

Interchange numbers are irrelevant as players come and go for HIA's and incidents on report. The idea is ok but no idea how it can be managed.

Don't know what a shot clock is unless its something to measure the power of the shot in the tackle, ultimately pointless.

Why can't we just go back to playing Rugby League.


Bit of an over reaction on the Golden point front, I don`t see you calling the NRL stupid for it. I don`t have an issue with it, it`s not that often we see draws but in the cases we do it just adds a bit of extra excitement to the weekly rounds.
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: financialtimes, Khlav Kalash, metallicat, phe13, PopTart, Willzay and 118 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Wakefield Trinity


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,827,8431,33077,3414,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
SLXXIV
LONDON BRONCOS
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 10th Feb 15:00
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
ST. HELENS
Thu 21st Feb 19:45
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
CATALAN DRAGONS
Fri 1st Mar 19:45
SLXXIV
LEEDS RHINOS
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 10th Mar 15:00
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
HULL KR
Fri 15th Mar 19:45
SLXXIV
HULL FC
v
WAKEFIELD
Thu 21st Mar 19:45
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
WARRINGTON
Sun 31st Mar 15:00
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
SALFORD
Fri 5th Apr 19:45
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
HUDDERSFIELD
Fri 12th Apr 19:45
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
WIGAN WARRIORS
Thu 18th Apr 19:45
SLXXIV
CASTLEFORD
v
WAKEFIELD
Mon 22nd Apr 15:00
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
LEEDS RHINOS
Sun 28th Apr 15:00
SLXXIV
HULL FC
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 5th May 15:00
SLXXIV
HUDDERSFIELD
v
WAKEFIELD
Sat 18th May 15:00
SLXXIV
LONDON BRONCOS
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 9th Jun 15:00
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
LEEDS RHINOS
Sun 16th Jun 15:00
SLXXIV
SALFORD
v
WAKEFIELD
Fri 21st Jun 19:45
SLXXIV
WARRINGTON
v
WAKEFIELD
Thu 27th Jun 19:45
SLXXIV
WAKEFIELD
v
HUDDERSFIELD
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)






33