marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:30 am  

says in express that we have to sell player for him to come in, any thought on who it be ? n thoughts on ridyard too

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:34 am  

griswold63 wrote:

says in express that we have to sell player for him to come in, any thought on who it be ? n thoughts on ridyard too

I think the LE makes it up as it goes along.

Player loan swap i get but selling a player to get a loan player Also who have we got to sell other than Johnstone and Jowitt? Chester will have had to of had a full frontal lobotomy to attempt that.

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:42 am  

deffo don't want jowitt or johnstone to go vasty you maybe right they making it up, as don't live in wakefield wondered if anyone heard anything on grape vine, tansay surely is surplus asv are a few others inmho but we see

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:43 am  

Slight difference in interpretation I think, what Chester said was that we would have to move a player on before anything could happen which differs slightly from selling a player.

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:44 am  

chissitt wrote:

Slight difference in interpretation I think, what Chester said was that we would have to move a player on before anything could happen which differs slightly from selling a player.

Yep, that's what I was trying to say and failed.

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:50 am  

You would see Tansy or Owen as possible make weights. Who would want to replace Finn with Ridyard after yet another reasonable performance with the boot at the weekend?

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:02 pm  

No would not want to move Finn on, we need 3 halves to ensure on the cover, that is the point.

I would say Tansey, Owen, or even Walton. His game time is limited, and we have ample cover at centre and second row

Out of curiosity, when is Reece Lyne contracted up to

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:05 pm  

Yes, you're right. The fact I'd completely forgot about Walton probably points to him being more expendable.

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:08 pm  

vastman wrote:

Yep, that's what I was trying to say and failed.

Talk of a deal for Leigh half-back Martyn Ridyard is some way off.
The Wildcats have been heavily linked with the out of favour half-back for the remainder of this year on a loan deal, after Ridyard fell down the pecking order at the centurions following the arrival of Josh Drinkwater and Travis Burns.
League Express understands that althought the Wildcats retain an interest in the player, there are numerous details to be sorted before any transfer can begin to be discussed.
One key issue is finance, with Wakefield insistent that they have to move a player on before any deal can be struck up for a new player.
The transfer could yet be resurrected in the coming days as the situation could change quickly if Wakefield manage to offload a player, but for now talk of a Ridyard move has cooled.

There it is in it's entirety, I suppose he's got a player or two in mind what's occ at the end of the season, getting somebody to take might be a problem though.

Re: marin ridyard : Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:23 pm  

Reading your comments their Chissitt, would indicate to me that we are just about full on the salary cap, saying player out before a player in.

However, a few weeks ago, both CC and MC have both said we will be operating at the full cap from next year, if our crowd averages above 6k. We are a little short of that at the mo.

I had actually heard that we are now been linked with Mitch Cornish, a 23 year old half back.

Also, recently been looking at players off contract at other clubs the end of this year and Jordan Turner off contract at Saints, could he do a job for us, quite creative, and I think a little more defensively sound than Craig Hall. Any thoughts?