Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sat Oct 03, 2015 7:40 pm  

Maybe he's on about Wakeys 2nd try which never was, because Silverwood gave Simon offside from a charge down (which he couldn't be)?

Game could have been over early doors.

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 1:37 am  

he blamed the ref for having a bad day at the office, well if mr lowes had done better at his job and got Bradford to third place in the league they wouldn't have had to play yesterday

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:02 am  

adelaide-giant.no9 wrote:

he blamed the ref for having a bad day at the office, well if mr lowes had done better at his job and got Bradford to third place in the league they wouldn't have had to play yesterday

To be fair, Wayne Bennett wouldn't have got us to 3rd under the current rules. You'd need two SL clubs to completely implode for a Championship club to bridge the gap under the current rules.

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:35 am  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

To be fair, Wayne Bennett wouldn't have got us to 3rd under the current rules. You'd need two SL clubs to completely implode for a Championship club to bridge the gap under the current rules.

Think it's fair to say we've pretty much imploded this year

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:47 am  

Schunter wrote:

Think it's fair to say we've pretty much imploded this year

Perhaps so and is probably why we came as close as we did to getting the result yesterday. In fact I still believe that squad we had yesterday was good enough so it was definitely a lost opportunity. I can't see such an opportunity in the future unless the rules are altered. Are Wakefield looking to strengthen considerably or are you looking at a similar season to this in 2016?

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:52 am  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

Perhaps so and is probably why we came as close as we did to getting the result yesterday. In fact I still believe that squad we had yesterday was good enough so it was definitely a lost opportunity. I can't see such an opportunity in the future unless the rules are altered. Are Wakefield looking to strengthen considerably or are you looking at a similar season to this in 2016?

In the week leading up to the game Carter said if we stayed up we had some exciting signings lined up. Now his definition of exciting may differ from ours but let's wait and see

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 7:53 am  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

Perhaps so and is probably why we came as close as we did to getting the result yesterday. In fact I still believe that squad we had yesterday was good enough so it was definitely a lost opportunity. I can't see such an opportunity in the future unless the rules are altered. Are Wakefield looking to strengthen considerably or are you looking at a similar season to this in 2016?

I believe that now we're making a profit, we will be building more this year which is a good thing and all down to MC and CB for all their hardwork and dedication while receiving flack from our own fans. Onwards and upwards!

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:04 am  

Well that's definitely a plus for SL because you obviously haven't been competitive this year. Not sure where that leaves this new concept though. Probably in the garbage bin by 2017.

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:25 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

It's not like folk form Bradford to have a moan when they get there arses kicked (only just mind)
Poor, poor, Jimmy Lowes. He loves Belle Vue !

He must hate coming down to Belle Vue more than Eddie Hemmings.

Did anyone else remember when he was Warrington coach and he got into a right argument with a wakey fan. The more he argued the more Warrington crumbled???

Re: Jimmy Lowes : Sun Oct 04, 2015 8:27 am  

Bully_Boxer wrote:

Well that's definitely a plus for SL because you obviously haven't been competitive this year. Not sure where that leaves this new concept though. Probably in the garbage bin by 2017.

There ll be yet another shake up to the system and we'll end up with 3 divisions of 10 teams with 1 up, I down between the leagues, probably in 2/3 years time.