No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 1:54 pm  

Discuss

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:00 pm  

Tricky2309 wrote:

Discuss

Coaches choice. Hard to understand - and I've had an explanation of sorts, I just don't necessarily agree! I'm not a coach though, just a speccie!

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:05 pm  

Baffled. As another poster said earlier, if he doesn't make this 17, I doubt he'll ever get back into the squad. I hope this isn't turning into a situation where Agar wouldn't drop his favourites even when they underperform.

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:08 pm  

It worked against Saints to a certain extent with Washbrook at 9 for 20 mins then McSHane although it's disappointing that someone of Sammut's creative ability can't be found a place in the 17.

Let's hope it pays off this afternoon....

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:16 pm  

Webster brings two forwards in on loan.
If he doesn't use them, people say what's the point in bringing them in?
One less of our own to get laid up.
Think the crunch game for Sammut will be Easter Monday, if he doesn't get a game against a team that's played Friday, maybe he never will.

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:20 pm  

Webster doesnt seem to want sammutt and wane doesnt seem to want to play ryan hampshire so can I suggest we make them a loan swap offer as they are struggling for a stand off and it would save us some cash and get a quality player who might just get a game

Re: No Sammut : Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:35 pm  

Said late last season Webster doesn't seem to rate Sammut, I guess he's still unsure. Having said that I wouldn't play him at nine either. Unless one of Miller and Smith are injured then he's not going to get much of a sniff.

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:13 pm  

Backfired massively.

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:24 pm  

How was Sammut going to make a difference in the first 15 mins?
We didnt have the ball.
Can he tackle everything Willzay?

Re: No Sammutt : Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:31 pm  

When I meant backfired massively, I was talking about putting Washbrook at 9 to tighten the defence. Clearly that hasn't worked.