Re: Bulls Players : Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:56 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

this is starting to look like a nifty bit of business by CC, the auditor almost appears to be on strings!

Told you so.

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:18 am  

I cannot think that the meeting with the players tomorrow will be fruitful for the fringe & the older players as they will have trim down the wages straight away.
Hopefully the Bulls fans will help the club by attending what is probably the clubs worst income game of the season this weekend. They will be looking for a 10,000 plus attendance & with emotions running high I think they should achieve it.

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:01 am  

newwildcat wrote:

Because they have mortgages to pay and most of the "big" clubs won't have much space under the cap?

Take your point but the 'bigger clubs' always seem to have big caps don't they?

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:54 am  

westgaterunner wrote:

I cannot think that the meeting with the players tomorrow will be fruitful for the fringe & the older players as they will have trim down the wages straight away.
Hopefully the Bulls fans will help the club by attending what is probably the clubs worst income game of the season this weekend. They will be looking for a 10,000 plus attendance & with emotions running high I think they should achieve it.

meeting was cancelled and the players can't train for health and safety reasons!!!! It gets more bizzare by the day!

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:00 am  

bren2k wrote:

Told you so.

All i can say is, I'm glad I'm not a creditor, because BG doesn't seem to be acting in the best interests of those owed money.
Perhaps he is only being realistic, and with only one interested party he may not have too much choice, but it just looks too cosy!!!

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:14 am  

Both situations seem similar from the outside. Ted ran out of money and couldn't pay bills and neither can the Bulls and even though the Belle For situation was murky at best, everything else seemed straightforward.

Something tells me the truth of Bradford's mess may never come out.

Players whinging on twitter I can do without though. If they are good enough, another club will pick them up. Those behind the scenes who don't have that advantage I have sympathy for as I'm sure many of us have been there.

Wasn't BG one of Leeds United's administrators in the past?

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:40 am  

kinleycat wrote:

All i can say is, I'm glad I'm not a creditor, because BG doesn't seem to be acting in the best interests of those owed money.
Perhaps he is only being realistic, and with only one interested party he may not have too much choice, but it just looks too cosy!!!

Reading on their forum though it suggests another guy (Greenwood?) was interested but has been shut out by the administrator?!?

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:49 am  

Bulls need to get rid of a few high earning players. Like Quel Suprise said we didn't get the going rate when we got rid of ours last year. Im sorry but Bradford have kept a good team throughout all of this, they need to start making sacrifices to the higher earning players like we had to !!!

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:55 am  

18th Man wrote:

Reading on their forum though it suggests another guy (Greenwood?) was interested but has been shut out by the administrator?!?

If that is the case, the auditor will have to have a good reason for doing so, if the other guy's offer is better for the creditors he will have a good cause to take action against the auditor as will they.

[PopTart]

Re: Bulls Players : Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:58 am  

kinleycat wrote:

If that is the case, the auditor will have to have a good reason for doing so, if the other guy's offer is better for the creditors he will have a good cause to take action against the auditor as will they.

If they have money, he'll be interested.
Just the CC conspiracy theory getting out of hand.