DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 9:56 am  

Oh dear, what can the matter be
Bradford bulls gone down the lavatory

Who will our spies be circling, Oliver, Burgess????????????????

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:02 am  

The return of Ben Jeffries?

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:14 am  

I know it's not very classy but I think we should be trying to get the likes of Kopczak, Whitehead, Lulia, Elima signed up. I wonder if this will affect Sykes as presumably we pay the Bulls and they pay him.

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:16 am  

robbed in 68 wrote:

Oh dear, what can the matter be
Bradford bulls gone down the lavatory

Who will our spies be circling, Oliver, Burgess????????????????

You think Tom Burgess would go to Wakefield when he's being touted in Australia. I'll have what he's having. Stick with rejects like Paul Sykes.

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:20 am  

robbed in 68 wrote:

Who will our spies be circling, Oliver, Burgess????????????????

Whitehead.

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:21 am  

RatedRKO wrote:

:lol: You think Tom Burgess would go to Wakefield when he's being touted in Australia. I'll have what he's having. Stick with rejects like Paul Sykes.

ah diddums

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:25 am  

newwildcat wrote:

I know it's not very classy but I think we should be trying to get the likes of Kopczak, Whitehead, Lulia, Elima signed up. I wonder if this will affect Sykes as presumably we pay the Bulls and they pay him.

Presumably (don't know for certain) but we should be able to make Sykes a permanent fixture if we wanted him. I agree we should be looking at the 4 players mentioned, it does sound harsh but other clubs will be looking to do so; should we hold back on moral grounds?

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:28 am  

I dont think we should be gloating here. Although we came through the other side and our club is making great strides forward, just think back 18 months or so since.
Personally I have much sympathy with the vast majority of their fans (excluding the ones who took pleasure in our own plight) and although many of us can now say "I told you so"
this is not a good day for the sport.

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:34 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

I dont think we should be gloating here. Although we came through the other side and our club is making great strides forward, just think back 18 months or so since.
Personally I have much sympathy with the vast majority of their fans (excluding the ones who took pleasure in our own plight) and although many of us can now say "I told you so"
this is not a good day for the sport.

I agree with you, unfortunately it's a harsh reality that unless a wealthy benefacter steps from the shadows PDQ, players will have to be sold off to pay creditors. If WTW can benefit from that rather than our rivals then we should. That's not to say I don't sympathise with the Bulls fans. I'd rather the Bulls weren't in this mess, however they are and if there's an opportunity to strengthen our squad we should take it.

Re: DULLS IN ADMIN : Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:35 am  

wrencat1873 wrote:

I dont think we should be gloating here. Although we came through the other side and our club is making great strides forward, just think back 18 months or so since.
Personally I have much sympathy with the vast majority of their fans (excluding the ones who took pleasure in our own plight) and although many of us can now say "I told you so"
this is not a good day for the sport.

I agree, it is very sad what has happened, and you do think to the fans with how we were feeling


It begs the question how can this happen so soon after licencing!