Wed 23 May : RLFANS.COM will be undergoing maintenance over the next few days and the service may be unavailable periodically.
WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Hull FC v Wakefield

Board index Super League Wakefield Trinity Hull FC v Wakefield

Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:50 pm
Posted by Mr. Zucchini Head on Tue Sep 12, 2017 6:50 pm
Mr. Zucchini Head Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 10
Rep Position: 25th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 8

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:10 pm
Posts: 10939
Kirmudgeonly wrote:
The full 19-man squad to face Wakefield is as follows:

1. Jamie Shaul
2. Mahe Fonua
3. Carlos Tuimavave
4. Josh Griffin
5. Fetuli Talanoa
6. Albert Kelly
7. Marc Sneyd
8. Scott Taylor
9. Danny Houghton
10. Liam Watts
12. Mark Minichiello
13. Gareth Ellis
14. Jake Connor
16. Jordan Thompson
17. Danny Washbrook
19. Steve Michaels
21. Sika Manu
22. Josh Bowden
28. Brad Fash

So pretty much everyone available , yet bizarrely I feel confident although I am in pub Korki korki!!


Yes, Chris Green is the only one missing that would play if fit. Although there will be doubts over a couple of them I reckon. Talanoa and Carlos didn't make it last week and Minichiello has been carrying a knock.

Still no excuses for us with that squad. Whoever loses this I reckon their race is run. Id be gutted to lose, but if we do there isn't really another side that I would rather see take our place. Your boys have done you proud this year whatever and it's been great to see after some of the dross you've had to put up with in recent times.

May the best team win.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:18 am
Posted by upthetrin92 on Thu Sep 14, 2017 10:18 am
upthetrin92 Eddie Hemmings's Wig
Eddie Hemmings's Wig

Reputation Points: 1
Rep Position: 34th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 6:36 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Northstand
Hopefully we take a good following tonight, heard there on the 5th bus from wakey? not sure how true that is?

was a fair few at salford, here's hoping people travel over.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:02 pm
Posted by 60sCat on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:02 pm
60sCat Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 1
Rep Position: 34th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 7:19 pm
Posts: 293
it's really tough being a Wakey fan.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:08 pm
Posted by Eastern Wildcat on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:08 pm
Eastern Wildcat Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 5
Rep Position: 30th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 340

Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:55 am
Posts: 2018
So near again.

Unfortunately, too many silly errors, and yet again switching off at vital times.

When will they learn from previous mistakes.

Last week the scapegoat for some was Grix, maybe this week Finny.

The drop goal miss was pressure, but about 4 missed tackles, one of which led to a try at a vital time.

There is talking of new signings, it is silly season with rumours, I just hope one is of a scrum half
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:12 pm
Posted by marc271841 on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:12 pm
marc271841 Stevo's Armpit

Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2013 9:35 pm
Posts: 84
Not that I'm bitter. It was a great game and I'm proud of the boys. But I'm bemused by the decision given in the build up to Ellis' try.

Kirmond was remonstrating with the ref too.

The players who prevent Ben Jones Bishop from diving on the ball (which he could have simply done if not for the there presence) are offside when it's kicked.

As soon as Ben Jones Bishop touches that ball (trying to trap it with his foot which is surely legitimate) they should not interfere with play. If he caught the ball cleanly, they couldn't tackle him. So how if he touches it with his feet are they allowed to get involved?

I'm happy for someone to come up something to explain, but I thought it was the wrong decision and Wakefield should have been given a penalty.

As I say not bitter but could have been a different game.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:15 pm
Posted by Slugger McBatt on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:15 pm
Slugger McBatt User avatar
Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 17
Rep Position: 18th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 36

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 5479
Location: Over there
marc271841 wrote:
Not that I'm bitter. It was a great game and I'm proud of the boys. But I'm bemused by the decision given in the build up to Ellis' try.

Kirmond was remonstrating with the ref too.

The players who prevent Ben Jones Bishop from diving on the ball (which he could have simply done if not for the there presence) are offside when it's kicked.

As soon as Ben Jones Bishop touches that ball (trying to trap it with his foot which is surely legitimate) they should not interfere with play. If he caught the ball cleanly, they couldn't tackle him. So how if he touches it with his feet are they allowed to get involved?

I'm happy for someone to come up something to explain, but I thought it was the wrong decision and Wakefield should have been given a penalty.

As I say not bitter but could have been a different game.


But if travelled ten yards after BJB played at it, don't they become onside?

The real error is that it wasn't a knock on and Hull in fact did knock it on.
WAKEFIELD TRINITY - MORE ANCIENT. MORE LOYAL.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:17 pm
Posted by King Street Cat on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:17 pm
King Street Cat User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 21
Rep Position: 14th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 268

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:49 am
Posts: 3011
Location: WF4
Should have actually been head and feed to Wakefield in the resulting scrum as BJB didn't knock on while trying to regather it.
She sucks nitro... with Phase 4 heads! 600 horsepower through the wheels!
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:19 pm
Posted by Cats13 on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:19 pm
Cats13 Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 4
Rep Position: 31st / 76,860

Quiz Score: 324

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:25 pm
Posts: 271
Not forgetting the out and out knock on by Kelly when they got the ball back before their first try.

Great effort and commitment tonight, totally gutted.
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:28 pm
Posted by supercat on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:28 pm
supercat Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 10:34 pm
Posts: 1843
Touch judge calling a late tackle when clearly wasn't. I can't understand why he didn't use the video ref as foul play can be looked at and would have cleared Arona
Re: Hull FC v Wakefield
Post Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:33 pm
Posted by Adam_Harrison9 on Thu Sep 14, 2017 9:33 pm
Adam_Harrison9 Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 5
Rep Position: 30th / 76,860

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 716
The boys once again played their hearts out but boy do I get sick of being able to predict what is going to happen.

Taking 2 10 metres out when Hull are on the run and down to 12? That is the symptom of the mentality the last 2 games. Just lack that ruthless edge at key moments. Hull didn't even have to play well for more than half a game, let's be fair. Second half we were never in it and they were nowhere near 100% first half. Soon as they upped the intensity we couldn't get out of our half.

Badly trying not to be negative but so disappointed that we lose in that manner two weeks running. (Short term context). We've still had a good season but ultimately we don't have a chance of winning anything aside from a miracle.
We both profess noble intent as we civilize human impediments.
So if your hands are clean then noblesse oblige that you wipe that "who me?" look off your face and concede
Our designs separated by nothing more than place and time.
Different scenes, same crimes.
Pray, let him who's without sin cast the first statues of
The former rogues turned folk heroes that your forefathers hung.
Don't lecture me about plundered soil while you loaf upon your father's spoils.
We want nothing more than what you already have:
A comforting set of exculpatory "facts"
Like, say, the myth of an empty land and a conquest so complete
We can pull these tanks from our streets
And hand the loose ends over to bureaucrats and become just like you -
Lounging carefree in your cafes, absolved from sin
And human grenades. Entre nous, how did your desert bloom?
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1873, coco the fullback, djcool, Emley Cat, KevW60349, Upanunder, wakefieldwall, westgaterunner, Willzay and 114 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Wakefield Trinity


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,733,6861,78876,8604,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
TODAY 09:00
NRL
CANBERRA
v
MANLY
TODAY 10:50
NRL
NQL COWBOYS
v
MELBOURNE STORM
TODAY 19:30
SUPER LEAGUE
SALFORD
v
HUDDERSFIELD
TODAY 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
WARRINGTON
v
HULL FC
TODAY 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
HULL KR
v
WIGAN WARRIORS
TODAY 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
WIDNES VIKINGS
v
WAKEFIELD
Thu 7th Jun 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
WAKEFIELD
v
WIGAN WARRIORS
Sun 17th Jun 15:00
SUPER LEAGUE
WAKEFIELD
v
WARRINGTON
Sun 24th Jun 15:00
SUPER LEAGUE
WAKEFIELD
v
WIDNES VIKINGS
Fri 29th Jun 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
ST. HELENS
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 8th Jul 18:30
SUPER LEAGUE
WAKEFIELD
v
CATALAN DRAGONS
Fri 13th Jul 20:00
SUPER LEAGUE
LEEDS RHINOS
v
WAKEFIELD
Sun 22nd Jul 15:00
SUPER LEAGUE
WAKEFIELD
v
HULL FC
Fri 27th Jul 19:45
SUPER LEAGUE
HUDDERSFIELD
v
WAKEFIELD
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)






33