Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:37 pm  

jaybs wrote:

TROLL

In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory,extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. The noun troll may refer to the provocative message itself, as in: "That was an excellent troll you posted."

While the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels subjective, with trolling describing intentionally provocative actions and harassment outside of an online context. For example, mass media has used troll to describe "a person who defaces Internet sites with the aim of causing grief.

Is that the first time you've used google.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 6:42 pm  

1) Someone who gets pleasure by typing annoying/controversial words at strangers on internet forums for them to read. 2) A user or member on a forum that goes out of their way to make pointless, offensive, or annoying posts and messages. 3) One who intentionally posts on internet forum to gain attention rather than contribute actual content. Some trolls may appear to contribute and may actually have meaningful posts, but the posts will be made in such a way that content is overlooked by design. 4) Somebody who patrols an interweb forum or message board and uses childish tactics and droll wit. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... orum+troll Could be any of us at times so keep posting and carry on.

1) Someone who gets pleasure by typing annoying/controversial words at strangers on internet forums for them to read. 2) A user or member on a forum that goes out of their way to make pointless, offensive, or annoying posts and messages. 3) One who intentionally posts on internet forum to gain attention rather than contribute actual content. Some trolls may appear to contribute and may actually have meaningful posts, but the posts will be made in such a way that content is overlooked by design. 4) Somebody who patrols an interweb forum or message board and uses childish tactics and droll wit. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... orum+troll Could be any of us at times so keep posting and carry on.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:25 pm  

And back to the event..... The team dominated the game for the first twenty minutes spending most of it in the opposition half without showing much penetration, but defensively looking solid. We score first after a twenty-two minute clean sheet but immediately stop thinking, letting in a try to level the scores. Then it starts to unravel allowing three sloppy tries in. 6 - 24 at half time. Second half 20 minutes of Broncos even getting a try. How can a player looked so startled when the ball appears in front of him?

Has anyone seen a referee spending so much time waiting for Sinfield to tell him what to do. Yes it was six to go but Sinfield needs to tell you to decide that?

Half time and we are in the game, we could go on and do something, but the something is basically nothing. And as the clock strikes sixty (think cinderella) the defence turns into a pumpkin and 34 points get conceded. If I'd left after 59 mins I would have said we were not a bad side just lacking something, like confidence, composure and concentration to dominate games, oh and tackling technique when someone breaks the line and we have to improvise. Most teams know how to defend desparately, we don't we tend to go powder puff. Last twenty was embarrasing, very embarrasing.

I'd have to say quite a few players individually had good games just not collectively. Didn't we fall apart at Huddersfield after 60 mins the week before (no difference) and how many other games has it happened, most of them it would seem. Phil Clarke give us the stats.

I'm still attending and will continue to do so, more for the people I meet up with, and the craic , rather than the game itself.

Worryingly Gower was on crutches and might not be around for a week or two.

Next game wear an obscure rugby league shirt.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 8:58 pm  

Perhaps we should all walk out after 60 minutes, for a change.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:08 pm  

You'd be crushed at the bar.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 9:32 pm  

If Powell is going at the end of the season, then the club should announce it now. Reading the comments on facebook and here, it would seem that a fair few of the 900 or so ST holders are not going to renew..........

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:49 pm  

I'm going to hold a review on whether to renew

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:52 pm  

Darthchris wrote:

I'm going to hold a review on whether to renew

Just don't tell anyone the outcome.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 10:56 pm  

jbuzza wrote:

Just don't tell anyone the outcome.

Re: DISGRACE : Sun Jul 01, 2012 11:54 pm  

jaybs wrote:

It's not Bashing, it is just so many of us are sick and tired of him repeating the same points over and over again and how he has all the answers, then telling us how good he is, I think we have got the point by now and even if we don't necessary agree with he has had his say.

Yes its so easy to fire bullets from thousands of miles away, all I wish GF would accept us mostly we are on the ground and know what is wrong, and don't need to be constantly lectured, I hold my hands up and admit that I do not see all the media or what is happening every week down on the ground and in London, except for what some friends send me and fortnightly or so visits.

I did not clap the team off as I was walking off to get on the road, but it is up to them!

Who are the 'many' who are 'sick and tired' of GF repeating the same points over and over again?