Re: Wakefield : Sat May 27, 2017 9:47 am  

Kendall was terrible but I don't think there's any bias, he's just incredibly incompetent. We've had him for our last three SL games and he completely lost control against Leigh, was pretty rubbish against Widnes but gave us the rub of the green and then was just as bad yesterday, albeit this time completely against us.

Re: Wakefield : Sat May 27, 2017 12:14 pm  

honours even this season I live abroad at the moment so listened to radio, some strange decisions highlighted but at the end of the day 2 key points possibly, you refused a shot at goal then took one to 4 points up perhaps you should have run that one as well.

Re: Wakefield : Sat May 27, 2017 3:56 pm  

Chetnik wrote:

It's actually the opposite. He was released by the club and is very bitter about it.

Well it din't show.

You lost the game not because you were the better team, you weren't 5 tries to four tells you that. You lost because you took two points with ten minutes left that actually made no difference to your position in the game - terrible decision.

Re: Wakefield : Sat May 27, 2017 8:46 pm  

jakeyg95 wrote:

Kendall was terrible but I don't think there's any bias, he's just incredibly incompetent. We've had him for our last three SL games and he completely lost control against Leigh, was pretty rubbish against Widnes but gave us the rub of the green and then was just as bad yesterday, albeit this time completely against us.

..........and what sort of a system is that- a joke Any infringements by a player can be carried over to the following games and the result is minor infringements are punished much more than they deserve!
IMO there should be a pool of refs who officiate a team at the max one game home and away each season and iif there are insufficient then steps should be taken to address the deficiency.You hear refs "coaching" players on first name terms In my book if its an infringement penalise it as often its not applied equally - and that's when players and fans get wound up!

""

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 28, 2017 9:34 am  

vastman wrote:

Well it din't show.

You lost the game not because you were the better team, you weren't 5 tries to four tells you that. You lost because you took two points with ten minutes left that actually made no difference to your position in the game - terrible decision.

in hindsight.

sam williams changed the game for shakefield... his kicks and setting up tries

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 28, 2017 12:45 pm  

brearley84 wrote:

In hindsight.

sam williams changed the game for shakefield... his kicks and setting up tries

What's hindsight got to do with any of that

Re: Wakefield : Sun May 28, 2017 1:33 pm  

FWIW I think Hudds can be proud of that display. First half you were better than us in every way. Just couldn't handle us when we put any kind of quick PTB's together.

Re: Wakefield : Mon May 29, 2017 9:01 am  

chissitt wrote:

What's hindsight got to do with any of that

referring to the poster mentioning giants taking a kick at goal instead of playing on.

Re: Wakefield : Mon May 29, 2017 9:02 am  

TrinityIHC wrote:

FWIW I think Hudds can be proud of that display. First half you were better than us in every way. Just couldn't handle us when we put any kind of quick PTB's together.

think alot of that was down to ikahihifo and rapira getting on top in the forward aloowing leeming to get on the front foot

but then our bench let us down abit when they went off... wakeman and clough... clough was better 2nd half