Re: Hardaker : Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:36 pm  

I'd assume they'd say "with this signing our squad is complete"

Re: Hardaker : Thu Oct 20, 2016 5:41 pm  

Well they have announced on twitter their squad is complete and you can now vote for squad numbers and do heir fantasy team. We will have to see.

Re: Hardaker : Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 pm  

We don`t need Hardaker, he is a loose cannon and causes trouble.
We are apparently going with what we have, and that will do me as we have some good players, just need motivating and good conditioning. These clubs signing 5 and 6 players always have trouble getting them to gel.

Re: Hardaker : Thu Oct 20, 2016 11:09 pm  

Giantscorpio wrote:

We don`t need Hardaker, he is a loose cannon and causes trouble.
We are apparently going with what we have, and that will do me as we have some good players, just need motivating and good conditioning. These clubs signing 5 and 6 players always have trouble getting them to gel.

Who says we are going with what we have. Stone says he needs a full back an outside back and a forward. Currently we don't have anyone to play full back next year. Someone will be brought in.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:03 am  

brearley84 wrote:

cup game when wardle got a red card?

I know which game (Still got it on DVD) what I was asking was which punch?

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 9:26 am  

the stella kid wrote:

Who says we are going with what we have. Stone says he needs a full back an outside back and a forward. Currently we don't have anyone to play full back next year. Someone will be brought in.

Just inside info. Unless it is being held close to the chest for secrecy.
But with what we have Murphy could go to full-back, and Ormsby to wing, he has the ability just needs him to knuckle down and get on with the job, he is a strong finisher.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:06 am  

Giantscorpio wrote:

Just inside info. Unless it is being held close to the chest for secrecy.
But with what we have Murphy could go to full-back, and Ormsby to wing, he has the ability just needs him to knuckle down and get on with the job, he is a strong finisher.

That sounds perfect if we want to play championship in 2018

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 11:15 am  

At the last HGSA meeting the question re FB were quite clear.

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 12:06 pm  

Giantscorpio wrote:

We don`t need Hardaker, he is a loose cannon and causes trouble.
We are apparently going with what we have, and that will do me as we have some good players, just need motivating and good conditioning. These clubs signing 5 and 6 players always have trouble getting them to gel.

So we not going without the Bradford 3?

Re: Hardaker : Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:39 pm  

Giantscorpio wrote:

We don`t need Hardaker, he is a loose cannon and causes trouble.
We are apparently going with what we have, and that will do me as we have some good players, just need motivating and good conditioning. These clubs signing 5 and 6 players always have trouble getting them to gel.

We may not need Hardaker but we certainly need someone, If you think we can go with the same squad and get different results , well good luck with that. There is only so much changing players round you can do, eg. Ellis backup Hooker perhaps ?

The idea is to keep trying to strengthen the first choice team, not just plod on with the same or get more mediocrity in from Bradford. The club needs to get away from that attitude, It's held sway for far too long at the Giants.