Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:47 pm  

Scapegoating of Hinchcliffe, dear oh dear.

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:35 pm  

Well Paul --its gotta be somebody else`s turn !

Either that or we try him at full back!

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:41 pm  

On here it all depends who you are 'scapegoating' Roderico. If they don't like them it's acceptable scapegoating,but if they do like them well then it's just horrible scapegoating

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Tue Aug 16, 2016 10:43 pm  

Point being take Hinchy out of acting half,after a stint on d,then he still easily looks our most committed to go forward,good lines etc

Best prop on t'field you could say.

What does this say about the rest of 'em.

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:30 pm  

boomer wrote:

so where is lawrence going to play, been great at loose, l think both Lawrence and Hinchcliffe should play loose, lawrence for the Giants, Hinchcliffe for Newcastle Knights.

thats the problem, lawrence would have to lose his place for this to happen

not that he deserves to lose his place

plenty of options available for stone to find the right formula

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Wed Aug 17, 2016 12:32 pm  

hooking role so important for a team, especially in attack and hinchcliffe just hasnt cut it in attack im afraid from this posotion

look what segayaro has done for leeds...

higham does it for leigh, lots of examples

full back too, look at wire with ratchford half back turn full back ... same with topkins at wigan... brierley could do it

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:43 pm  

l am not scapegoating Hinchcliffe, more sticking up for Lawrence, but its no secret l don,t like Ozzies, lazy pension packers,
Lawrence is playing very well at loose
Hinchcliffe wants to play loose
So Lawrence, a loyal, hard working, top player, here for the long haul, or
Hinchcliffe, here today gone tomorrow, pension packer ????

your call

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Wed Aug 17, 2016 6:28 pm  

boomer wrote:

l am not scapegoating Hinchcliffe, more sticking up for Lawrence, but its no secret l don,t like Ozzies, lazy pension packers,
Lawrence is playing very well at loose
Hinchcliffe wants to play loose
So Lawrence, a loyal, hard working, top player, here for the long haul, or
Hinchcliffe, here today gone tomorrow, pension packer ????

your call

Lawrence is a hard working good defender, in every other way he is average, which Hinchcliffe has struggled to rise above as well, despite him proving at the highest level he can do it.

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:43 pm  

so you go Hinchcliffe,and Lawrence can look for a job somewhere else? or he will be happy to be a squad player?
There will be plenty of offers l am sure.

l think Lawrence has been one of our unsung hero,s, l think he could easily hack it in any SL club needing a 2nd row, Loose forward
given the choice Hinchcliffe would be gone in the blink of an eye.

Re: ryan hinchcliffe : Thu Aug 18, 2016 6:49 pm  

Why does someone have to leave. I am sure some of you are only happy if you can find something to moan about.