Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:48 am  

Facing a two match ban for colliding with Bebtham in the Widnes Wire game. Total noke. He was watching the ball. Bentham got in his way. Then bang. Where is the protection of players in these matters.its not as if he could stop himself

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 7:54 am  

Leythersteve wrote:

Facing a two match ban for colliding with Bebtham in the Widnes Wire game. Total noke. He was watching the ball. Bentham got in his way. Then bang. Where is the protection of players in these matters.its not as if he could stop himself

Lucky to get away with it last season IMO- he knew exactly what he was doing, could he not see the yellow shirt or summat, and none of this following the ball carp

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 8:08 am  

Still think its harsh. But thats just my opinion

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:20 am  

Leythersteve wrote:

Still think its harsh. But thats just my opinion

Not as harsh as Jamie's four game ban against Salford and, he too can be seen watching the ball

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:29 am  

Leniency is being offered, on the basis that he hasn't got any 'previous'. That's because the same player was found not guilty of doing the same thing, to the same ref, last season!

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:35 am  

Alan wrote:

Leniency is being offered, on the basis that he hasn't got any 'previous'. That's because the same player was found not guilty of doing the same thing, to the same ref, last season!

All very logical to me

Re: Chris Houston : Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:55 am  

Alan wrote:

Leniency is being offered, on the basis that he hasn't got any 'previous'. That's because the same player was found not guilty of doing the same thing, to the same ref, last season!

Could be this season's Myler trip!