Well you twisted that comment to make yourself look a bit of a wally didn't you - read my comment again and have another go and see if you can the figures a bit more accurate
2/10 poor effort
I'd prefer to leave it at a healthy rugby league discussion. If the "confused dot com" was a trigger, that was for the coaching team. Either way, the stats are enlightening don't you think? Almost a quarter of the squad pushed aside and labelled troublemakers or not good enough. Like I said in another thread, what is the coaching team communicating to the players to get such a "negative" response?
Interesting times ahead, stay up or the inevitable.
The majority on the forum seem to think Green was the worst signing since David Stephenson, but I actually thought he did OK when given a chance early on, seemed to make good yards. New club, new team, new game plan, etc, surely consistency breeds growth. Bottom line, Derek must be scratching his head when paying the wages for the guys not playing.
The majority on the forum seem to think Green was the worst signing since David Stephenson, but I actually thought he did OK when given a chance early on, seemed to make good yards. New club, new team, new game plan, etc, surely consistency breeds growth. Bottom line, Derek must be scratching his head when paying the wages for the guys not playing.
For me, James Green has to fall into the category of "Not given a proper chance". The odd 20 minutes spell in an odd game or two, doesn't fairly prove anything. On the rare occasions when he was selected, he did no worse than any of the other forwards.
For me, James Green has to fall into the category of "Not given a proper chance". The odd 20 minutes spell in an odd game or two, doesn't fairly prove anything. On the rare occasions when he was selected, he did no worse than any of the other forwards.
For me, he looked ok for first one or two carries, but was then knackered. His defence was too weak as well.
That said, he should be given a chance to redeem himself on Friday, so we can wrap a forward up in cotton wool ahead of mpg. If someone like HH was to get injured this week, then we'd be staring down the barrel
That said, he should be given a chance to redeem himself on Friday, so we can wrap a forward up in cotton wool ahead of mpg. If someone like HH was to get injured this week, then we'd be staring down the barrel
For me, he looked ok for first one or two carries, but was then knackered. His defence was too weak as well.
That said, he should be given a chance to redeem himself on Friday, so we can wrap a forward up in cotton wool ahead of mpg. If someone like HH was to get injured this week, then we'd be staring down the barrel
With the current situation I think the barrel is already loaded and we're well and truly looking straight at it - any more injuries like you have highlighted above pulls the trigger
With the current situation I think the barrel is already loaded and we're well and truly looking straight at it - any more injuries like you have highlighted above pulls the trigger
Sad, but true.
I'm going to do some work, to try and take my mind off it!
Injuries are an excuse, period. A third into the season when 12 first team regulars were injured, they may let you use that one. But with approx 23/24 squad members available all handpicked by the coaching team... Nah, doesn't wash. Stop focusing on what you don't want and get the boys to believe and motivated and win 2 more games.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 253 guests
REPLY
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...