Re: Sheffield. : Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:42 pm  

This arrangement may have been long in the planning but I would have thought Bradford a better option.
Without knowing when this went from discussions to agreements in relation to Bradfords recent troubles, it would be hard to say if Bradford could have been an option.
Bradford are geographically closer & pre implosion a better squad with a reputable youth set up.

Of course any deal with Bulls could also have gone completely T!T$ Up !!!

Re: Sheffield. : Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:59 pm  

Couldn't agree more Ste, I think that seagulls carry as much risk as Bulls to be honest, but I've never been a fan of Aston and don't think that I ever will be

Re: Sheffield. : Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:58 pm  

glow wrote:

Where's the fun in that?

In fairness over on their board they seem to accept that this arrangement should benefit both clubs, and AC has been quite complimentary.

I know, I had to have a sit down after I had read ACs comments.