Re: Andrew Dixon : Sun Aug 28, 2016 10:52 pm  

Well dixon has done eell 4 us when fit, SL quality no, so good luck in canada and thanks. Pownall always tried his best, but clearly not Sl class. If jukes amd db rated em snd wanted em, they would of signed for us, they dont, so they have gone.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 6:49 am  

Dixon has been in our squads of 19 for recent games. He possibly could still have a job to do for us this season, before he moves on.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:46 am  

Alan wrote:

Dixon has still in our squads of 19 for recent games. He possibly could still have a job to do for us this season, before he moves on.

Correct Alan. The likes of Dixon and Armstrong will be busting a gut to bow out from this group as winners.

You often hear a team mention the phrase ' creating memories together'.

Both are total professionals, and I have absolutely no concerns with either.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 4:20 pm  

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:

You often hear a team mention the phrase ' creating memories together'.

Let's hope that they turn out to be treasured memories for all members of the squad that still wish to help deliver SL to LSV. No problem with any that fall into that category. Bon chance to them thereafter and the devil take the rest!

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:38 pm  

The Centurians Squad page continues to list Dixon but none of the other Toronto bound players. Also still present are Beswick and Barlow, on the other hand surprised to see Tom Armstrong as gone missing?

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:46 pm  

JackDiggle wrote:

The Centurians Squad page continues to list Dixon but none of the other Toronto bound players. Also still present are Beswick and Barlow, on the other hand surprised to see Tom Armstrong as gone missing?

Tom played at Featherstone last week.

The player sponsor page in the matchday programme, doesn't have Beswick, Barlow, Kay, or Pownall in it. Armstrong, Dixon and Worthington were there for the Salford game.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:06 pm  

Alan wrote:

Tom played at Featherstone last week.

The player sponsor page in the matchday programme, doesn't have Beswick, Barlow, Kay, or Pownall in it. Armstrong, Dixon and Worthington were there for the Salford game.

Dixon, along with Spencer, Reynolds and others were in attendance at Fev in full club gear.

Dixon, Armstrong, Spencer etc are ultimate professionals and still have a lot to offer for the rest of the season even though they are moving on.

Others... maybe not so much!

Re: Andrew Dixon : Tue Aug 30, 2016 10:53 am  

TV BOY wrote:

What's your financial backing got to do with me disliking the continual Toronto crap? Intill I see and hear things with my own eyes I believe nothing. I have only seen what Paul and those players have done on the field. The rest I really don't care about.

You've seen things with your own eyes this season already.Has DB not brought better players in to replace the outbound ones? Not only has he had to fork out for the incoming players but also continue's to pay the wages of the ones sat at home.Thats what I mean about financial backing.

Again it maybe continual Toronto crap too you,but its been costly to our club. I'm not saying players don't get approached outside their windows,but thats usually one player not half a dozen from one club by the same club with no intervention or questions asked from the governing body.

The season/squad is by far better now than last,with no thanks to Paul Rowley, his disciples and the Toronto Whateverpack.But I respect your point on not caring about the rest.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:03 pm  

atomic wrote:

You've seen things with your own eyes this season already.Has DB not brought better players in to replace the outbound ones? Not only has he had to fork out for the incoming players but also continue's to pay the wages of the ones sat at home.Thats what I mean about financial backing.

Again it maybe continual Toronto crap too you,but its been costly to our club. I'm not saying players don't get approached outside their windows,but thats usually one player not half a dozen from one club by the same club with no intervention or questions asked from the governing body.

The season/squad is by far better now than last,with no thanks to Paul Rowley, his disciples and the Toronto Whateverpack.But I respect your point on not caring about the rest.

I still fall to see what any of that has got to do me me saying that "I" - meaning me personally - have had enough of all the Toronto crap. They are gone and we move forward thanks to Derek and the great crowds we are getting. One is a negative the other is a very large positive. I prefer the latter.

Re: Andrew Dixon : Tue Aug 30, 2016 12:45 pm  

Nozzy wrote:

Dixon, Armstrong, Spencer etc are ultimate professionals and still have a lot to offer for the rest of the season even though they are moving on.

Others... maybe not so much!

I could not agree more Nozzy.