Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:03 pm  

Has been charged with a Grade C - Dangerous contact with no EGP available. 1) What the hell is this for? Can't think of any incident yesterday that this would be about. 2) How come he doesn't have an EGP? I didn't think he had been in trouble this season but I guess he must have? 3) Nice to see whilst Hansen gets a grade C (seems to be the minimum grade for Leigh players!) Fev were looked at over 3 x dangerous throws and 1 x dangerous contact. 3 grade A's and 1 caution issued. 4) No mention of the biting allegation from AJ despite it being put on report. http://www.rugby-league.com/article/383 ... rs-charged

Has been charged with a Grade C - Dangerous contact with no EGP available. 1) What the hell is this for? Can't think of any incident yesterday that this would be about. 2) How come he doesn't have an EGP? I didn't think he had been in trouble this season but I guess he must have? 3) Nice to see whilst Hansen gets a grade C (seems to be the minimum grade for Leigh players!) Fev were looked at over 3 x dangerous throws and 1 x dangerous contact. 3 grade A's and 1 caution issued. 4) No mention of the biting allegation from AJ despite it being put on report. http://www.rugby-league.com/article/383 ... rs-charged

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:08 pm  

This Will be real bad news if He cops a ban. I think he was banned for a game really early, which he carried over from his salford days, hence no EGP

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:19 pm  

Nozzy wrote: Has been charged with a Grade C - Dangerous contact with no EGP available. 1) What the hell is this for? Can't think of any incident yesterday that this would be about. 2) How come he doesn't have an EGP? I didn't think he had been in trouble this season but I guess he must have? 3) Nice to see whilst Hansen gets a grade C (seems to be the minimum grade for Leigh players!) Fev were looked at over 3 x dangerous throws and 1 x dangerous contact. 3 grade A's and 1 caution issued. 4) No mention of the biting allegation from AJ despite it being put on report. http://www.rugby-league.com/article/383 ... rs-charged No doubt anti Leigh Reffy will justify it for ya.

Nozzy wrote: Has been charged with a Grade C - Dangerous contact with no EGP available. 1) What the hell is this for? Can't think of any incident yesterday that this would be about. 2) How come he doesn't have an EGP? I didn't think he had been in trouble this season but I guess he must have? 3) Nice to see whilst Hansen gets a grade C (seems to be the minimum grade for Leigh players!) Fev were looked at over 3 x dangerous throws and 1 x dangerous contact. 3 grade A's and 1 caution issued. 4) No mention of the biting allegation from AJ despite it being put on report. http://www.rugby-league.com/article/383 ... rs-charged No doubt anti Leigh Reffy will justify it for ya.

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:29 pm  

wolrab613 wrote:

This Will be real bad news if He cops a ban. I think he was banned for a game really early, which he carried over from his salford days, hence no EGP

Just had a look and you are right.

Hansen got a grade B last September in the final round of the 8's, Salford v Hull KR. Because it happened in the last game of the year he basically had no EGP available for the entire 2016 season!

So far this season we have had players banned for 3, 3, 7 and 4 matches.

Hopefully there is nothing in this one, would be a kick in the balls to lose HH at this point on top of losing Acton for 4 matches last week.

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:38 pm  

Cokey wrote:

No doubt anti Leigh Reffy will justify it for ya.

Que?

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:43 pm  

The Match Review Panel description of Hansen's charge is: Rule – 15.1(i) Detail – Dangerous Contact - Defending player, in or after effecting a tackle, uses any part of his body forcefully to bend or apply unnecessary pressure to the head and/or neck and/or spinal column of the tackled player so as to keep the tackled player at a disadvantage in or after the tackle. Grade C In contrast, the Match Review Panel description of Ian Hardman's charge is: Rule –15.1(i) Detail – Dangerous Contact - Defending player, in or after effecting a tackle, uses any part of his body forcefully to bend or apply unnecessary pressure to the head and/or neck and/or spinal column of the tackled player so as to keep the tackled player at a disadvantage in or after the tackle. Grade A Very interesting! http://media.therfl.co.uk/docs/MATCH%20 ... .08.16.pdf

The Match Review Panel description of Hansen's charge is: Rule – 15.1(i) Detail – Dangerous Contact - Defending player, in or after effecting a tackle, uses any part of his body forcefully to bend or apply unnecessary pressure to the head and/or neck and/or spinal column of the tackled player so as to keep the tackled player at a disadvantage in or after the tackle. Grade C In contrast, the Match Review Panel description of Ian Hardman's charge is: Rule –15.1(i) Detail – Dangerous Contact - Defending player, in or after effecting a tackle, uses any part of his body forcefully to bend or apply unnecessary pressure to the head and/or neck and/or spinal column of the tackled player so as to keep the tackled player at a disadvantage in or after the tackle. Grade A Very interesting! http://media.therfl.co.uk/docs/MATCH%20 ... .08.16.pdf

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:45 pm  

Could it be Hansens tackle had more potential for injury than Hardman?

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:20 pm  

bulls2487 wrote:

Could it be Hansens tackle had more potential for injury than Hardman?

No. Hansen plays for Leigh.

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:26 pm  

Looks like the three dangerous throws that Fev players are up for are the same tackle. And they only get grade A because they didn't know what each other were doing.

With injury worries for Moimoi and Weston, along with Acton's ban, a ban for Hansen would have us down to bare bones.

Re: Hansen : Mon Aug 22, 2016 5:50 pm  

Cokey wrote:

No. Hansen plays for Leigh.

Really? So the 11 games Acton has got this season is down to RFL victimising Leigh?