WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Richard Moore - inconsistency ????

Board index Super 8s - Qualifiers Leigh Centurions Richard Moore - inconsistency ????

Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:00 pm
atomic User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2015 6:07 pm
Posts: 3842
Alan wrote:
The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!? :wink:


It needs overhauling.It needs something like a point system incorporating in the grading of an offence. Instead of letting players off scot-free,give them 3pts,same with a yellow.Hit 9pts and they automatically miss a game.

Would stop most of the Grade A's going unpunished and players getting away it.
Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 8:14 pm
GUBRATS User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 7:35 pm
Posts: 1693
ColD wrote:
I assume that's tongue in cheek, can argue Acton was hard done to but you can hardly compare the 2 incidents

Indeed, you could argue that moores challenge was similar to birds on Reynolds, which went unpunished - so there's your consistency


:wink:

Indeed , Moores challenge was similar , but no contact to the head , unlike Birds that did contact the head , yet he didn't get punished , maybe if Richard had collapsed to the floor and kept his eyes shut , he'd have avoided the yellow card as well
snaivooladniv eht fo thgim eht eraweb
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Tue Aug 08, 2017 11:02 pm
Centurino User avatar
Eddie Hemmings's Wig
Eddie Hemmings's Wig

Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2016 10:44 am
Posts: 126
atomic wrote:
I think there was a little grin from Mcnally as in job done.. :wink:


That's because he was realigning his C1 & C2!
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 1:43 am
Zulu01 User avatar
Eddie Hemmings's Wig
Eddie Hemmings's Wig

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:06 am
Posts: 171
Location: The rough side of Lowton
Absolutely scandalous

Blatent Obstruction

Shoulder Charge

Potential for Injury (They are always going on about that)

Punishment:

Nowt, Zip, Sod All.

Now if Jamie or Gaz had done that - Sine Die - Disgrace, Thug etc.

"What is happening" ???????
'aequo pede propera'
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:07 am
Harold Rigby Jnr User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: In't Tap Room
Alan wrote:
The title of this thread is "inconsistency". Yet, isn't the disciplinary process totally consistent - in its inconsistency!? :wink:


It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:45 am
Cokey User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 2910
Location: LEYTH
Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.


Unless it's Hock or Acton of course. :wink:
Image Image Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:28 pm
kirkhall User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:36 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Near Leyth
As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment :evil: :evil:
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't :evil: :evil: :evil:
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !
I keep editing this post :( I've watched the game for 64years this season and I have never seen such a harsh punishment given to any player and, boy have I seen some foul play :shock:
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Harold Rigby Jnr User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 4:45 pm
Posts: 1691
Location: In't Tap Room
kirkhall wrote:
As the weeks go by I'm getting more angrier over Jamies punnishment :evil: :evil:
The more incidents and games I see where players are going unpunished is disgraceful. I'm not saying I want other players banned, just that Jamie is treated the same which, he evidently isn't :evil: :evil: :evil:
Jamie has already missed four games with a possible seven more to come !


So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:48 pm
Cokey User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 2910
Location: LEYTH
Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
So what do you think the issue is then regarding Jamie Acton's actions in front an ever changing disciplinary panel and how do you suggest we implement any change for a more positive outcome ?


Harold,you've already stated the obvious......

Harold Rigby Jnr wrote:
It is all about interpretation and unfortunately the actual people on the disciplinary committee each week is not constant. A different set of people will see things differently to the previous set of disciplinary committee members.

If it was 'Atomic' sitting on it one week and me the other week we would both have a different outlook on matters I am sure.

The problem and solution is obvious. A full time regular disciplinary committee.



:thumb:
Image Image Image
Re: Richard Moore - inconsistency ????
Post Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:03 pm
Alan Silver RLFANS Member
Silver RLFANS Member

Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 5:39 am
Posts: 9721
Location: Deep in Leytherland
A full time regular disciplinary committee, consisting of an owner;(Leigh's) a CEO; (Leigh's) and a coach! (Leigh's of course! :wink: )
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Brian Wood, brooklands tap room, ColD, eddywalls, Hampo, Hessle rover, Iggy79, PAC, waterfield's finest, Willy and 189 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Leigh Centurions



POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,620,1751,72976,1844,491SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
 FT 
TODAY : 05:00
NRL
CANBERRA
22
- 26PENRITH
  
 FT 
TODAY : 07:00
NRL
CANTERBURY
30
- 16MANLY
  
 FT 
TODAY : 14:00
CH1
HEMEL
18
- 38CELTIC  
 FT 
TODAY : 14:00
CH1
OXFORD
22
- 22SOUTH WALES  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
CH1
WHITEHAVEN
36
- 4KEIGHLEY  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
CH1
WORKINGTON
22
- 21DONCASTER  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
8s
BATLEY
22
- 22OLDHAM  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
8s
SWINTON
16
- 30BRADFORD  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
8s
SHEFFIELD
28
- 35DEWSBURY  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
CH1
COVENTY
14
- 50LONDON  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
8s
HULL KR
35
- 30LONDON  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
CH1
BARROW
26
- 19YORK  
 FT 
TODAY : 15:00
8s
WIDNES
58
- 10FEATHERSTONE  
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM