WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Pattons no-try

Board index Super League Warrington Wolves Pattons no-try

Pattons no-try
Post Sat May 26, 2018 8:05 am
Posted by silver2 on Sat May 26, 2018 8:05 am
silver2 User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 77,256

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:06 pm
Posts: 1206
Location: Warrington
Dec Pattons disallowed try was an interesting one. The referee went to the video because he was unsighted.The video shows that it was a try, however because the whistle was in the refs mouth whilst the ball was just above the grass it was deemed tackle complete...and no try. The question then is if the referee is unsighted how could he call the tackle complete?
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sat May 26, 2018 8:38 am
Posted by wire-flyer on Sat May 26, 2018 8:38 am
wire-flyer User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 6
Rep Position: 29th / 77,256

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 558
Location: Reebok, 1800ft
I've pretty much given up trying to understand some of the rules now, they seem to change every single week
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sat May 26, 2018 8:40 am
Posted by wire-flyer on Sat May 26, 2018 8:40 am
wire-flyer User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 6
Rep Position: 29th / 77,256

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:53 pm
Posts: 558
Location: Reebok, 1800ft
Plus I don't think we should have an ex-ref in the commentary box pointing out every mistake the officials make to the viewers. As if they don't get enough criticism already.
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sat May 26, 2018 9:09 am
Posted by Fantastic Mr Catpiss on Sat May 26, 2018 9:09 am
Fantastic Mr Catpiss 100% League Network
100% League Network

Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2002 7:35 pm
Posts: 35958
silver2 wrote:
Dec Pattons disallowed try was an interesting one. The referee went to the video because he was unsighted.The video shows that it was a try, however because the whistle was in the refs mouth whilst the ball was just above the grass it was deemed tackle complete...and no try. The question then is if the referee is unsighted how could he call the tackle complete?

Poor positioning from hewer, he should have been front on, also had another player inbetween him, and the ruck
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sat May 26, 2018 10:41 am
Posted by just_browny on Sat May 26, 2018 10:41 am
just_browny Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 3
Rep Position: 32nd / 77,256

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 11:19 am
Posts: 3339
We were penalised for poor reffing there. It should have been a try but because Hewer wasn't paying attention the VR couldn't really give it.
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:
Horne > Myler


Best back row in the game?
Odemwingie wrote:
Depends what you're looking for.

Burgess, Ellis and Thaiday for strenth and being a nother prop.

If you want the whole package then Lockers is the best right now.


boz the warrior wrote:
lee briers is a nice person whoooo luck at lee forming a scrum the wire bum banger


Northampton_Saint wrote:
We have the best pack in the league pretty much,
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sun May 27, 2018 1:27 pm
Posted by The Railwayman on Sun May 27, 2018 1:27 pm
The Railwayman Strong-running second rower
Strong-running second rower

Reputation Points: 2
Rep Position: 33rd / 77,256

Quiz Score: 28

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 7:16 pm
Posts: 319
Not sure Cummings offers anything useful or incisive anymore, time to move on. As for the video ref, isn't the purpose to check and confirm / amend as appropriate. The ref got it wrong so the video ref should have over ruled him and the try should have been awarded. The Hull defence did not stop on the ref whistle.

As for the ludicrous current interpretation of the obstruction rule, it seems that sometimes the video ref is desperately trying to find a reason not to give a try. They should have an ex-pro along side for these who would you hope be more likely to better understand what has gone on re: misread / poor defensive read or actual obstruction
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Sun May 27, 2018 6:13 pm
Posted by Wanderer on Sun May 27, 2018 6:13 pm
Wanderer User avatar
100% League Network
100% League Network

Reputation Points: 4
Rep Position: 31st / 77,256

Quiz Score: 512

Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2002 4:48 pm
Posts: 51030
Location: Doncaster
The Railwayman wrote:
Not sure Cummings offers anything useful or incisive anymore, time to move on. As for the video ref, isn't the purpose to check and confirm / amend as appropriate. The ref got it wrong so the video ref should have over ruled him and the try should have been awarded. The Hull defence did not stop on the ref whistle.

As for the ludicrous current interpretation of the obstruction rule, it seems that sometimes the video ref is desperately trying to find a reason not to give a try. They should have an ex-pro along side for these who would you hope be more likely to better understand what has gone on re: misread / poor defensive read or actual obstruction


Hope it's a better ex-pro than those selecting the MoM candidates.
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Mon May 28, 2018 11:19 am
Posted by karetaker on Mon May 28, 2018 11:19 am
karetaker Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 5
Rep Position: 30th / 77,256

Quiz Score: 276

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:23 pm
Posts: 4753
Location: Out There.
Wigan looking to sign him,League Express again, the paper is very active today on our comings and goings.
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Mon May 28, 2018 2:49 pm
Posted by easyWire on Mon May 28, 2018 2:49 pm
easyWire User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 10
Rep Position: 25th / 77,256

Quiz Score: 32

Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:15 pm
Posts: 1226
Location: Dubai
It’s a shame if Wigan are able to take our hometown juniors and work on them, when we are looking to gamble on union exiles. Patton has impressed me more since his utility role backing up at 9.
Re: Pattons no-try
Post Mon May 28, 2018 4:49 pm
Posted by Wires71 on Mon May 28, 2018 4:49 pm
Wires71 User avatar
Gold RLFANS Member
Gold RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 5
Rep Position: 30th / 77,256

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 10344
easyWire wrote:
It’s a shame if Wigan are able to take our hometown juniors and work on them, when we are looking to gamble on union exiles. Patton has impressed me more since his utility role backing up at 9.


Yes but we need to replace a half back, not hooker.
https://www.mind.org.uk
Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrianBradyHandOff, Brid B&W, Builth Wells Wire, chris2925, Google Adsense [Bot], Hatfield Town Wire, karetaker, langer the king, moving on..., Old Timer No 4, Oxford Exile, philmac79, Phuzzy, rchick, rubber duckie, Rugby, scottty, spacks grandad, Uncle Rico, Wire Weaver, x43sflyer and 265 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to Warrington Wolves


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,808,4101,71177,2564,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)






21