Re: McGillvery : Tue Nov 14, 2017 9:19 am
I’d bet my house that this is total BS and pure conjecture on the part of some bored journalist, if you can call them that.McGillvary is contracted to Hudds for a while and despite us being able to pay any enormous transfer fee the wages he’d command would be better spent on key positions. Another creative marquee player is what we need. No point having an expensive and highly-paid winger who never gets the ball.
McGillvary is the total package as a winger though, and I do wish we had someone even close to his quality.