Re: Ratchford Charged : Mon Jun 19, 2017 8:35 pm  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

That's because it didn't happen like that. Marshall didn't change his running line at all. It should never have been a penalty. The Ratchford (and Hughes) ones were blatant and deliberate and should have been at least sin binning offences.

Blinkers from Rogues again. Marshall's was deliberate after Lineham chipped over him he turned looked right at him and deliberately obstructed him,.
I don't know why you're so annoyed Ratch will get banned as you wish.. And Powell has got away with using his studs on someone.

Re: Ratchford Charged : Mon Jun 19, 2017 9:15 pm  

one in one out stupid who is it going to be this week

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 11:02 am  

Rogues Gallery wrote:

That's because it didn't happen like that. Marshall didn't change his running line at all. It should never have been a penalty. The Ratchford (and Hughes) ones were blatant and deliberate and should have been at least sin binning offences.

I don't think it was the obstruction he was talking about but rather the ball & all tackle putting Lineham into touch. From one angle I thought it looked like a shoulder charge, another showed it wasn't.

As for the obstructions to be fair Marshall's one was, he did change his line but not to the same degree as Hughes as there was also a full back in attendance unlike the Hughes one.

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 1:01 pm  

Looks like he is contesting it, unlike others he as not used his EGP. First up at 5 pm.

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 1:27 pm  

Does the match review panel still operate which might pick up a few of the fouls against our players that seem to be going unnoticed recently ?

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 4:01 pm  

lister wrote:

Next time don't trip them, stand on them as Sam Powell only got a caution for it.

didnt sims get a ban for standing on someone or is my mind playing tricks

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:20 pm  

1 match ban

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 5:54 pm  

Serves him right for wearing the wrong shirt.

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:00 pm  

Must be Agar's fault

Re: Ratchford Charged : Tue Jun 20, 2017 6:19 pm  

As he challenged the ruling, rather than accepting with an EGP, does this mean if he would have submitted an EGP he would have escaped a ban?