Re: Mitch Clark : Mon Apr 25, 2016 6:11 pm  

just_browny wrote:

I think a starting front row of Mitchell Dodds, Daryl Clark and Mitch Clark would be just too much. Sorry.

Shame there isn't a Daryl Dodds around, I like alliteration!

Re: Mitch Clark : Mon Apr 25, 2016 8:07 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

He’s got a lot of potential but he’s very raw. Would do well under a decent coaching set up.

Plusses – He’s big, tough and takes the ball up at 100%. Has a huge appetite for work. Has a bit of mongrel too.

Minuses – Needs to work on his tackle technique – can clothesline players sometimes. Tends to overdo it a bit sometimes by demanding the ball too much – would make more of an impact if he paced himself a bit. Can lose composure a bit at times.

I’d be sorry to lose him. He’s been a big plus for us this year and he has the tools to become a decent SL player in the right environment.

he sounds like my kind of prop.

i hope we sign him based on this summary.

i especially liked the clothesline part.

[Winslade's Offload]

Re: Mitch Clark : Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:41 pm  

Looks as though we are interested in him, but have some competition for his signature; http://www.totalrl.com/gossip-two-super ... s-forward/

Looks as though we are interested in him, but have some competition for his signature; http://www.totalrl.com/gossip-two-super ... s-forward/

Re: Mitch Clark : Sun May 29, 2016 12:22 pm  

Watched him yesterday in the game against leigh looks a very good young prop good be a good signing