Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 9:35 am  

That being said:

Russell
Penny
Atkins
Bridge
Monas
Ratch
O'Brien
Hill
Higham
Sims
Westwood
Laithwaite
Harrison

Clark
Asotasi
Philbin
Currie

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:09 am  

Vespid_Wire wrote:

That being said:

Russell
Penny
Atkins
Bridge
Monas
Ratch
O'Brien
Hill
Higham
Sims
Westwood
Laithwaite
Harrison

Clark
Asotasi
Philbin
Currie

I could go with that but I would also throw in the idea of swapping Penny and Russell around. I think Penny could do well at FB - he's always been good under a high ball. Russell could stay on the wing. Apart from last week he's played well there this season.

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 11:35 am  

I think Joel does need to come back in on the wing as he takes away one of our major attacking threats out wide with the kick to him.

Its an obvious tactic but it has proven success

[Uncle Rico]

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:14 pm  

nico wrote:

I think Joel does need to come back in on the wing as he takes away one of our major attacking threats out wide with the kick to him.

Its an obvious tactic but it has proven success

Couldn't he swap with his partner at the appropriate play, just think of the confusion this would cause and merriment on the terraces when O'Brien puts in the grubber under the sticks instead for Clark to score, we would bamboozle every defence in SL...genius.

BTW I don't know why we are all bothering with this thread. Lefty, despite taking the time to join in, said it's a waste of time and TS knows best and we shouldn't be guessing or stating what our preferred line up's should be, we should just accept that we are foolish and be quiet.

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:26 pm  

Saddened! wrote:

Good to see Wheels back, I was getting worried that he was going to be as bad for you guys as he was for us.

His defence is, he was like a cat flap at Catalan.

Re: Re: : Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:36 pm  

lefty goldblatt wrote:

Can somebody please delve into the archives, and find that picture at Knowsley Rd, where Penny got hung out to dry by St Matthew of King, 5 or 6 seasons ago.

Yes, a lot of Saints attacking last week, came down Kevin's wing, and one try was scored wide out, BUT, Penny's 2nd Row and centre were within spitting distance of the posts. WHAT DO YOU EXPECT KEVIN TO DO? STAY ON THE TOUCH LINE AND SHOUT "LOOK, I'M IN MY CORRECT POSITION....IT'S NOT MY FAULT!".

No, he has to fill in, because we've been exposed in another man's position.

Warrington Scapegoatedry at it's finest, in this thread alone

Finally!!! If only some species that go the games had this view!! sick of hearing people bad mouth Penny....as iv said on other thread. He cant defend half a pitch on his own!1

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 12:57 pm  

Penny
Russell
Atkins
Wheeler - In over Bridge who doesn't look fit.
Monas
Ratchford
O'Brien
Hill
Higham
Sims
Philbin
Laithwaite
Westwood

Clark - Want to see him come off the bench and make an impact (like at Cas last year)
Harrison
Currie
Asotasi

Bridge & King to miss out.

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 5:41 pm  

What if Ratchford played Full Back in defence, and stand off in attack? Where in which Penny would then revert to full back to chime in to open space? Quite a bit of faffing around as to who to put in Ratchfords slot in defence (Currie perhaps?) But could be worth it...

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 6:32 pm  

Bridge stank the place out at Saints last week. Whether he's fit or not, he should be dropped on the basis of that display.

Re: 19 for Hudds : Thu Mar 26, 2015 6:38 pm  

Smith appears to love bridge almost as much as rubber duckie. If he's even 80% fit, he'll play.