Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:09 pm  

TheButcher wrote:

You see, Stan. I've been on here for thirteen years. You don't get to tell me where I can and can't post. So you might as well not bother trying to tell me again as you'll just be wasting your own efforts.

I will, go and stir trouble on your own forum instead of muddying these boards. At the end of the day you migrated because of me and now you're back pestering me to fulfill your sad boring life. Now Do One.

TheButcher wrote:

Like I've said numerous times, you class anyone who disagrees with you 'Antagonizing'. So it's no surprise that you see it here, when it isn't.

Absolute nonsense. Elevator Muzak. That's you to a tee.

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Fri Apr 22, 2016 4:55 pm  

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Sun Apr 24, 2016 8:43 pm  

FLAT STANLEY wrote:

Sorry guys I know you're trying to make a difference with these Podcasts but please get some decent punditry analysis. You lost me within five minutes when one of the guests said "Josh Griffin would be Greg Inglis material if played at Fullback'' Wow what was this guy smoking. Please treat this as constructive criticism and not a swipe at what you're doing. Cheers.

Some constructive criticism on your post, if you want to make " constructive criticism" don't post fix it with "wow what was that guy smoking". It does make it sounds like, well, a swipe.

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:39 pm  

Got people talking tho didnt it
We take compliments and advice on how to make the show better. Non of us a proffessionals just blokes that stand on the terrace.
Thanks for listening the more interaction the better

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:32 am  

The optimist wrote:

Got people talking tho didnt it
We take compliments and advice on how to make the show better. Non of us a proffessionals just blokes that stand on the terrace.
Thanks for listening the more interaction the better

Thanks for understanding my comment and for not taking it personally. Proving that a certain person was just antagonizing mountains out of molehills. Keep up the good work,

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Sun May 01, 2016 10:41 am  

.

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Sun May 01, 2016 11:38 am  

DEVILS2015 wrote:

If you actually listened clearly to the podcast the guest said 'You never know he could be a Greg Inglis in our team in the future'. Not "Josh Griffin would be Greg Inglis material if played at Fullback''.

I don't wish to have a squabble with you pal. But Josh Griffin shouldn't be compared to Greg Inglis in any way shape or form, nevermind mentioned in the same sentence. Josh Griffin is taking his chances well with regards to scoring tries, however, intermittently his defensive reads have been shocking, he lacks the pace to even be considered a Fullback nevermind his weakness and ineffectiveness in the taking of high balls which was highlighted by Ryan on the Podcast which I thought was a self-contradictory comment. So by Ryans logic a player with Zero pace who struggles to read the game defensively, who often gets out jumped under the high ball, would or could be a Greg Inglis of the future. Greg Inglis is the total opposite of Josh Griffin. He's fast, reads the game perfectly, hardly gets out jumped and is arguably the best strike player in the world. Case closed.

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Sun May 01, 2016 2:10 pm  

.

Re: New Devil in the detail out now Catalan away : Sun May 01, 2016 2:28 pm  

DEVILS2015 wrote:

Maybe the comparison that was being made was that both Josh Griffin and Greg Inglis both started playing in the centres and have now also played in the full back role? Making comments such as ''shows a total lack of expertise or knowledge of the game'' or ''Wow what was this guy smoking'' is slightly unfair and I'm sure others will agree.

Hahaha If you're comparing Griffin with Inglis, It shows your lack of Rugby League knowledge.