Re: This forum : Tue May 10, 2016 11:46 am  

Yeah, that'll be totally worth his while...

Re: This forum : Fri May 27, 2016 7:36 am  

So it seems that, in the near two months since I opened this thread, one or two things have been proved.

One is that Flat Stanley doesn't listen and is not prepared to behave with any good grace, but is a disruptive influence who will not moderate his behaviour.

He is therefore banned.

I'm posting this here for a number of reasons, including acting as a reminder that I am quite prepared to hand out bans for such disruption. If anyone is in doubt, banning for such a reason is in accordance with the AUP.

Everyone was warned – and certain 'suspects' were given the opportunity to prove themselves.

Re: This forum : Fri May 27, 2016 12:43 pm  

Mintball wrote:

So it seems that, in the near two months since I opened this thread, one or two things have been proved.

One is that Flat Stanley doesn't listen and is not prepared to behave with any good grace, but is a disruptive influence who will not moderate his behaviour.

He is therefore banned.

I'm posting this here for a number of reasons, including acting as a reminder that I am quite prepared to hand out bans for such disruption. If anyone is in doubt, banning for such a reason is in accordance with the AUP.

Everyone was warned – and certain 'suspects' were given the opportunity to prove themselves.

What about the disruptiveness of thebutcher. Surely whats good for the goose is good for the gander, although Stan is now been banned, it does worry me how the decision not to punish Stans aggressor was blindly overlooked. There's plenty of posts off thebutcher instigating disruptive waffle, which obviously got unbridled attention. Just saying.

Re: This forum : Fri May 27, 2016 1:52 pm  

MintBall is it possible to do a reverse DNS Lookup on the IP of the above user, just to double-check that this isn't a second account of the banned user?

Re: This forum : Fri May 27, 2016 9:03 pm  

whothefeckisalice now gone for being Flat Stanley.

Re: This forum : Sun May 29, 2016 7:59 am  

Mintball - Is `MarioRugby` still on board?

Re: This forum : Sun May 29, 2016 5:39 pm  

Early Bath wrote:

Mintball - Is `MarioRugby` still on board?

Would appear to still be around, but if you didn't know, that suggests he's decided to heed warnings and stay away from this forum.

Re: This forum : Tue May 31, 2016 7:02 am  

Cheers:
although, I will miss a person who seemed to become my sub-editor.

Perhaps ... maybe perhaps, debate will resume.

Re: This forum : Sat Jun 04, 2016 3:14 pm  

Hillbilly_Red wrote:

Cheers:
although, I will miss a person who seemed to become my sub-editor.

Perhaps ... maybe perhaps, debate will resume.

Re: This forum : Thu Jun 09, 2016 12:43 pm  

mint ball for president!