Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:28 pm  

Gallanteer wrote:

The main story sounds like guff. But the interesting element is the mention in the article above of a minimum 6500 attending games. I wonder if that will be enforced somehow. If so, Salford and Huddersfield are screwed.

Correct me if I'm wrong but its not about the minimum attending, but the figure is a minimum capacity of the ground. May or may not include a smaller number of minimum seating.

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:39 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

Also worth a mention that the Wakefield Community Trust passed the ruling that the Newcold building would not count towards the 106 agreement i.e. it would not count towards the trigger point for the building of the new stadium.

Are you sure ?
Is this yet another meeting where minutes were not taken ??

[Wildthing]

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 2:55 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Are you sure ?
Is this yet another meeting where minutes were not taken ??

... or more likely Tigerade stirring it against WT again. I really shouldn't bother with him bud.

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:19 pm  

wrencat1873 wrote:

Are you sure ?
Is this yet another meeting where minutes were not taken ??

Correct - passed by the ex-chair of the Trust - Sir Rodney Walker, hence his resignation.

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:28 pm  

Tigerade wrote:

Correct - passed by the ex-chair of the Trust - Sir Rodney Walker, hence his resignation.

Are you the fly that was on the wall ?

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Thu Mar 23, 2017 6:42 pm  

Once again when there's a Wakey issue Tigerars3 just has to pop up from under the bridge

[Wildthing]

Re: For Sale - 1 not so careful owner : Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:41 am  

Willzay wrote:

Once again when there's a Wakey issue Tigerars3 just has to pop up from under the bridge

He's obsessed