TheElectricGlidingWarrior wrote:
It's a terrible rule that I've been very critical of but let's face it, anyone saying there was conclusive proof that he missed it isn't being very honest. There was no replay that showed a gap between hand and ball and nothing to completely rule out the possibility of finger brushing ball. I'd say it was less likely that he did than he didn't, but the rules require conclusive proof. Those same rules apply to every team.
The only way it could have gone differently is if Hicks had discarded the rules and overturned the try without conclusive proof.
I could see his hand all the time and didn't see any part of it touch the ball though!
However, the problem is the system.
Thankfully it was irrelevant, the game was already over as a contest by then.