Re: Bradford : Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:09 pm
bren2k wrote:
The RFL refused to make such assurances to an extremely wealthy potential buyer of WTW, which is what prompted him to walk away from the deal.
Back then, a SL licence was NOT for sale - I wonder if that remains the case?
Back then, a SL licence was NOT for sale - I wonder if that remains the case?
Isnt there a fundamental difference in that with Wakefield we were on the verge of having the licences re-evaluated anyway, and it would quite clearly have been wrong to pre-judge that process.
Whereas Bradford are asking to fulfil the existing licence, and be judged in three years with everyone else. Hence the mention of SL clubs voting to keep them in.