: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:11 pm  

rhinofox wrote:

Leeds have had catalans celtic and quins at home already which is why its so low but i think £20 to stand is too much and keeping people away as well

And Salford last Monday who may have maybe brought 250.

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:52 pm  

which of the sl teams are in concerning financial positions? i know top bloke have been pointed at recently but any others?

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:56 pm  

bluesox4evaaa wrote:

which of the sl teams are in concerning financial positions? i know top bloke have been pointed at recently but any others?

I don't understand a word of that. Is it an anagram?

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:58 pm  

Racist comments removed. Mintball

: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:28 pm  

youngcat wrote:

2009 average attendances including todays games.

1 Hull FC 15,115
2 Leeds 14,978
3 Wigan 14,236
4 St. Helens 12,875
5 Bradford 11,370
6 Huddersfield 9,231
7 Hull KR 8,443
8 Warrington 8,388
9 Catalans 8,221
10 Castleford 8,003
11 Wakefield 5,772
12 Salford 4,945
13 Celtic 4,372
14 Harlequins 3,343

Good effort from Hull, hope they can keep it up.

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:02 am  

Situation dealt with. Mintball

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:04 am  

in percentage terms the biggest gainers are clearly huddersfield.

and i believe they can improve their crowds another 50% on current figures when they win a SL title.

st helens and bradford need new grounds for much gains in crowds from current figures.

leeds peaked a few years ago, again headingly needs further improvements.

warrington with a winning team could get back over 10,000 and push for ground improvements.

without new or improved grounds, not many clubs can go much higher

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:15 am  

dally messenger wrote:

on current figures when they win a SL title.

Spanked again today

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:47 am  

Orrell Lad wrote:

Good effort from Hull, hope they can keep it up.

Hull have had their derby which has helped their figures, but still is excellent.

: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:24 am  

Blummin 'eck, Rovers average since getting into SL is higher than 2000, 2001 & 2002 for our friends over the river. How can this be when we all know they have never had less than a 10k crowd since they were formed in 1465.

Is that a bandwagon I here rolling along