WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - "We can learn from Rugby League"

Board index Welcome to RLFANS The Virtual Terrace "We can learn from Rugby League"

Re: "We can learn from Rugby League"
Post Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:24 pm
Posted by Cokey on Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:24 pm
Cokey User avatar
Bronze RLFANS Member
Bronze RLFANS Member

Reputation Points: 243
Rep Position: 4th / 77,344

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:58 pm
Posts: 4873
Location: Across The Universe....... Jai guru deva om - Nothings gonna change my world.
caslad75 wrote:
Going slightly off on a tangent here, but does anyone else think that there should either be a VR at all games or none at all?


All games. In SL that is.
Image
Re: "We can learn from Rugby League"
Post Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:44 pm
Posted by caslad75 on Tue Feb 13, 2018 3:44 pm
caslad75 User avatar
Cheeky half-back
Cheeky half-back

Reputation Points: 47
Rep Position: 63rd / 77,344

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:15 am
Posts: 698
Location: Hemsworth
Cokey wrote:
All games. In SL that is.


I’m not too fussed, but I just believe that it should be all SL games or no SL games. Not a VR at televised games only
Re: "We can learn from Rugby League"
Post Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:32 pm
Posted by PrinterThe on Tue Feb 13, 2018 4:32 pm
PrinterThe Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 34
Rep Position: 76th / 77,344

Quiz Score: 0

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2017 8:34 pm
Posts: 2216
Shouldn't go to NO VR at all. It'll only take a few occasions especially in a big game possibly the GF where a try is allowed when it shouldn't be and people would be crying foul that the sport took a backward step in getting rid of technology when nearly every other sport has embraced it now.

Would get rid of the on field decision or tweak it where if the footage is inconclusive then the VR can send it back down to the on field ref who can then signal and decide what he originally thought. The VR shouldn't haven't one armed tied behind his back like he does now.
Re: "We can learn from Rugby League"
Post Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:56 am
Posted by coco the fullback on Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:56 am
coco the fullback User avatar
Free-scoring winger
Free-scoring winger

Reputation Points: 29
Rep Position: 81st / 77,344

Quiz Score: 296

Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:48 pm
Posts: 2212
Location: Hiding behind a palm tree in the mountains
Grimmy wrote:
I'm perhaps in the minority then, in that I think the video ref can make tries anti-climatic, and negatively impact the atmosphere at games. I'd reduce its use to a coaches' challenge system. Coaches can have 2 challenges each, which can only be used at stoppages. Let them keep challenging if they are shown to be correct. This would also hopefully reduce the amount of criticism they throw at refs, as the simple retort would be "Well why didn't you challenge it at the time?". Of course there is the chance that they could keep challenging correctly, thus undermining the on field ref, but that would probably deserve scrutiny, if it happened. I'd also extend use of video ref to include serious foul play (i.e red card offences only). We don't want players staying on the pitch, then getting long bans afterwards.

Other than that, leave it with the on-field team. Having a better atmosphere/product is more important than the odd difficult call the match officials may get wrong IMO, and we would do better to focus more on the action, and less on the refs.


My problem with the current system is that it's used too often. Does someone who watches all the sky games have a feel for what proportion of referee's decisions are overturned?
I would go with a captain's challenge (say 2 per game, lose one if you're wrong), but only when the referee is uncertain, as now.
So, if he awards the try directly, there is no challenge. If he goes to the screen with try/no try, it's effectively offering the choice to the captain. If he chooses not to challenge, it doesn't go to the screen and the referee's decision stands.
An example of this at the Wakefield - Salford game. Miller's try went to the screen as no try and it wasn't given. You saw miller shake his head when asked by the team, so he knew he hadn't scored. The no try wouldn't have been challenged and we would have saved a few wasted minutes.
Previous

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], BRIXTON, Bull Mania, ducknumber1, little wayne69, NEtrinity, stroger, Traffic, vitch and 123 guests

Quick Reply

Subject: Message:
   

Return to The Virtual Terrace


POSTSONLINEMEMBERSRECORDYOUR TEAM
4,828,0491,23077,3444,559SET
LOGIN HERE
or REGISTER for more features!.
Thu 31st Jan 19:45
SLXXIV
WIGAN WARRIORS
v
ST. HELENS
Fri 1st Feb 19:45
SLXXIV
HULL KR
v
HULL FC
Fri 1st Feb 19:45
SLXXIV
HUDDERSFIELD
v
SALFORD
Fri 1st Feb 19:45
SLXXIV
CASTLEFORD
v
CATALAN DRAGONS
Sat 2nd Feb 17:00
SLXXIV
WARRINGTON
v
LEEDS RHINOS
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
 CH
LEIGH
v
TOULOUSE
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
 CH
BATLEY BULLDOGS
v
BARROW RAIDERS
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
 CH
BRADFORD BULLS
v
FEATHERSTONE
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
 CH
ROCHDALE
v
DEWSBURY RAMS
Sun 3rd Feb 15:00
 CH
SHEFFIELD
v
SWINTON LIONS
ALL SCORES PROVIDED BY RLFANS.COM (SETTINGS)






2