Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 10:05 am  

Frank Whitcombe wrote:

I can't see the team that was on the park yesterday winning another game all year, and it's absolutely down to the physicality of the opposition compared to our youngsters - lets not forget even the loanees are still kids. London ran through us yesterday, almost at will.

I've said it before and I stand by it, they are risking their careers playing week in week out given the potential of being badly hurt against grown men, and they'd be mad to not be looking elsewhere in the absence of any comms from our placeholder owners.

I say placeholder, as I'm now convinced that's exactly what they are, one of them used his programme notes yesterday to tell us all about his lunch in Auckland, seriously WTF!

For me it's all psychological rather than Physical right now. We had some superb wins this season with a team probably younger on average than the one yesterday. Right now we are shot confidence wise. As i said on the other forum, just go back to basics with the big men like Oledzki and Peltier running straight and as hard as they can. I'm still holding out hope as we've still all the bottom teams to play and that one win and getting on zero will release all the pressure and all the crap currently on these young players shoulders. The question is where are these wins going to come from. Dewsbury away is going to be be tough. It will be a horrible game to play in as well.

[Bullseye]

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 10:18 am  

We lack leaders on the field. Pryce is crocked and Moore will be gone soon. We got a taste of what it will be like. Lilley was the one doing all the talking under the sticks. He's just a kid himself.

Can't see where the next win is coming from.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 11:26 am  

It's not psychological. the two main factors were a) continually giving away possession - you will never have a chance if you never have the ball - and (b) being completely and totally physically dominated from 1 - 17. Like I said, dads v lads.

Anyway, ChaLowe or whoever is reporting to them would plainly realise that this is suicide, if they were listening, and so we are wasting our breath and our keyboards.

Oh, and *IF* it turned out we've some kind of "GetOutOfJailFree" card promised (which I don't believe for even second) that may be handy for the owners, but if that's it, then it is also a big finger up all the mug supporters, who thought the games actually mattered, and it wasn't just a redundant poitless season of drubbings. And that the "owners" would tell us what they were doing, by which I don't mean anecdotes about what was for lunch in the Wellington fscking Waldorf.

How Lowe thought it appropriate to write about the random waffle that he did, on the back of some serious canings, tells me all I need to know.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 11:56 am  

In the yorkshire junior leagues (at u12 anyway), the score is capped at 50points, so not to dishearten the kids too much if they come up against a complete mismatch. Perhaps we could ask the RFL for the same rule?

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 11:56 am  

Highlander wrote:

In the yorkshire junior leagues (at u12 anyway), the score is capped at 50points, so not to dishearten the kids too much if they come up against a complete mismatch. Perhaps we could ask the RFL for the same rule?

That would be good. We could all just leave at half time then.

[Bullseye]

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 11:58 am  

Will a televised 70-80 point thrashing get a comment out of Chalmers?

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 12:00 pm  

Bullseye wrote:

Will a televised 70-80 point thrashing get a comment out of Chalmers?

No, but I'm sure we'll find out what Lowe had for his tea.

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 12:20 pm  

redeverready wrote:

Believe Mick if you want but it's common knowledge among Rugby league change is coming and it's not going to be liked by certain clubs.

Looks like Mick is aligning with your previous posts on twitter...You crystal ball is clearly better than his Netto version

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 12:32 pm  

Chalmers followed Toovey up the steps before the game his gaze firmly downwards. Looked like a man with a heavy weight on his shoulders...

Re: Chalmers and Lowe the conspiracy : Mon May 22, 2017 12:54 pm  

We now need 8 points to stay up as Swinton are on 6 and the bottom 2 go down if i am correct NFC of staying up