[Bulliac]

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 9:34 am  

CHEADLE LEYTHER wrote:

Piemen well beaten by the wire tonight. Makes our performance look even better. By the way did Lee Briers come on as sub in the 2nd half last Saturday? Going off the Bradford website they are having a major wobble, and I think we can afford to lose one more game and still finish top due to our superior points diff. The most difficult game might be Fev. as we all know what comes with them don't we?

Lol, don't know if you mean the team or RA&B which is having the wobble.

The team hasn't really 'hit their straps', [as they say] all season, except the odd game and patches here and there. Usually just done enough to win, but have generally been far too profligate with the ball and sloppy in defence. The major hope is that bigger challenges in the eights will bring out the best in them but my suspicion is that the deeper pockets of SL will ultimately prevail. Think we have much in common, for what it's worth.

Now, if you think the message board is having a wobble, well I have to tell you, that is it's normal position - I've been on here for double yonks and still haven't got used to it! Putting some underpants on my head, a straw down each nostril and going La La La seems to help....

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 11:15 am  

Bulliac wrote:

Putting some underpants on my head, a straw down each nostril and going La La La seems to help....

I believe you are supposed to say 'wibble'.

[Bulliac]

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 3:02 pm  

Pumpetypump wrote:

I believe you are suppos ed to say 'wibble'.

Ahh, of course - that's maybe why I'm not getting full benefit...

That said, la la la blocks out the contradictory voices much better. I think maybe 'wibble' is for when I present at the doctor hoping to get signed off?

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 6:21 pm  

roger daly wrote:

Haha some very funny comments on here about foul mouth Beaumont

Totally agree with the Bulls stance on this. If he wants to go watch a neutral game he should pay like everyone else

By the way the guy is a total buffoon

Don't know where you get your info from as A. Derek was not searching for a freebie he was more than happy to pay and stand on the terraces with other fans. B. He did not turn up and get sent away by your security staff. he stayed home. C. You need to look closer to home for foul mouthed buffoons, did your team not also get reprimanded for bringing game into disrepute and inciting Mr Beaumont. Fact

[Pumpetypump]

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 6:41 pm  

jacquiep wrote:

did your team not also get reprimanded for bringing game into disrepute and inciting Mr Beaumont. Fact

You are fantasising. Fact. Absolutely nowhere has anyone other than derek claimed his moronic behaviour was because he was 'incited'. If you can find a quote from the rfl that backs up your claim post it.

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Fri Jul 03, 2015 7:24 pm  

jacquiep wrote:

Don't know where you get your info from as A. Derek was not searching for a freebie he was more than happy to pay and stand on the terraces with other fans. B. He did not turn up and get sent away by your security staff. he stayed home. C. You need to look closer to home for foul mouthed buffoons, did your team not also get reprimanded for bringing game into disrepute and inciting Mr Beaumont. Fact

I thought there was a statement posted on the Leigh clubs official Facebook page? Much like anything I doubt anyone has actually read it for themselves are just piling in on the bants.

Re: Bradford vs. Featherstone : Sat Jul 04, 2015 6:39 am  

Pumpetypump wrote:

You are fantasising. Fact. Absolutely nowhere has anyone other than derek claimed his moronic behaviour was because he was 'incited'. If you can find a quote from the rfl that backs up your claim post it.

Well put Pp. I always find it strange that the guilty ones are the "council for the defence" in their stance over an incident.
I know for a fact that the said Mr B started the incitement of our Players who were sat in the stand ie they weren't chosen to play but were either on the injury list or part of the non chosen squad.
Our reprimand as we all know was due to ill chosen comments in the tunnel about the performance of the official.
Mr B was fined £2000 we were warned about comments that were predjudicial to the game, or some such jargonise.
The case rests, more in our favour than theirs.
Their points difference is not only on the field of play, but leads the SL and Championship? I refer to sin binnings etc., at, I believe is now somewhere in the region of 34...doesn't make for the angelic badly done to syndrome, does it???