Re: Attandance at Batley : Wed Mar 18, 2015 5:43 pm  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

You've lost it mate. A claim that there was not space for another 5000 people is not, to anyone with basic English comprehension, the same as a claim there WAS another 5000 people. I hesitate to be rude, but that is a really dumb attempt at a point

HamsterChops wrote:

Something's wrong somewhere. Either the capacity is significantly less than 7,500 or the attendance yesterday was significantly more than 2,223. There is no way 5,000 more people could fit in that ground.

If your not trying to be rude then why do so, It's not me what is suggesting a deficiency of 5k but your friend above I merely pointed out that his post contradicted yours and that one of you must be wrong, if you cannot grasp basic English, or indeed my post is beyond your comprehension I will be happy to explain it in simpler terms.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

You can s'ugges't whatever ya like, does'n't make it any les's' abs'urd though

I think that a 6 page thread suggests that it does not make it absurd.

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

Er.. no it musn't, and no, it doesn't. A couple of wins seems like - oddly enough - a couple of wins.
You are drunk! Go on, fess up! When ya sober up please do me a favour and point out where I claimed ANY figure for the attendance - much less 7K!

It seems your arrogance is showing through already, this time last year you'd have been ecstatic with 4 wins out of 5, and fwiw I never said anything about you claiming about any specific figures for the attendance, but don't let that get in your way of selective misquoting and throwing a few insults in as well, anyway I don't want to outstay my welcome and as much as Iv'e enjoyed it, it's time to go, lets hope you have some proper success at the end of the season.

Re: Attandance at Batley : Wed Mar 18, 2015 5:51 pm  

martinwildbull wrote:

come on Chissit, try a bit harder, FA is answering you in his sleep,

Well thanks for that, it makes things so much clearer now

Re: Attandance at Batley : Wed Mar 18, 2015 8:04 pm  

I thought I was making an observation based on spacial awareness and the amount of people I could see. As it happens, I was apparently making an arrogant statement that our club are the most amazing and successful in history, bring joy into the lives of millions every day, and were instrumental in the Berlin Wall coming down. Or some other b0llocks, I don't know I stopped reading...

I would make an observation about this Chissitt fellow, but I suspect he'd probably think that was something akin to me declaring war on Bolivia.

Re: Attandance at Batley : Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:46 pm  

chissitt wrote:

Well thanks for that, it makes things so much clearer now

Glad to help you, even if you are apparently in the same position you were before.

Re: Attandance at Batley : Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:48 pm  

HamsterChops wrote:

I thought I was making an observation based on spacial awareness and the amount of people I could see. As it happens, I was apparently making an arrogant statement that our club are the most amazing and successful in history, bring joy into the lives of millions every day, and were instrumental in the Berlin Wall coming down. Or some other b0llocks, I don't know I stopped reading...

I would make an observation about this Chissitt fellow, but I suspect he'd probably think that was something akin to me declaring war on Bolivia.

As far as I'm aware you were only voicing your opinion as to what you perceived a reasonable attendance figure, and for my part I only used your post as a comparison to the special one's post in which he targeted me despite me having no direct or indirect dialogue with him, it would seem matey that you are just a victim of circumstances in all of this, and if I was you I'd forget all about global warming, and the fall of the Berlin wall, trust me none of it was your fault and nobody's blaming you, so my fatherly advice to you is pick your toys' up put them back in the pram and stop feeling sorry for yourself, some things are better not said, so if you feel that making an observation about me might cause a civil war in Bolivia best thing to do is say nowt. Good Luck

Re: Attandance at Batley : Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:00 am  

Bullseye wrote:

He'll not get that either.

In order to get a joke or reference you must be of .80 intelligence or higher.

Is that the best you can do..lol

Re: Attandance at Batley : Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:40 am  

amberavenger wrote: Notice to certain Leigh fans - we aren't constantly talking about Leigh despite what you might think Thanks for the consideration you have shown in making that comment..Very much appreciated. This Video is Hosted on Youtube : Users should see the AUP for allowable uses

amberavenger wrote: Notice to certain Leigh fans - we aren't constantly talking about Leigh despite what you might think Thanks for the consideration you have shown in making that comment..Very much appreciated. This Video is Hosted on Youtube : Users should see the AUP for allowable uses

Re: Attandance at Batley : Thu Mar 19, 2015 12:46 am  

chissitt wrote:

If your not trying to be rude then why do so, It's not me what is suggesting a deficiency of 5k but your friend above I merely pointed out that his post contradicted yours and that one of you must be wrong, if you cannot grasp basic English, or indeed my post is beyond your comprehension I will be happy to explain it in simpler terms.

Go on, then.

chissitt wrote:

I don't want to outstay my welcome and as much as Iv'e enjoyed it, it's time to go,

No, you said you'd be happy to explain in simpler terms how one of us must be wrong, and we are waiting with bated breath for your explanation. In simpler terms.

Re: Attandance at Batley : Thu Mar 19, 2015 1:02 am  

chissitt, in response to Hamster Chops wrote:

.... so my fatherly advice to you is pick your toys' up put them back in the pram ...

I am also struggling a bit with the complexity of this advice, and whilst you're kindly offering to give free English comprehension masterclasses for those of us not blessed with your mastery of expression, could you just help me with a couple of points?

1. Despite me having ribbed you rather obviously about your previous grocer's apostrophe, you s'eem to have s'lipped another one in. This seems unfortunate, for a self-proclaimed master of comprehension, so I assume it has some hidden import that us mere mortals cannot grasp, and not a case of you being barely literate, but could you jus't clear it up for us'?

2. There's an apparent flaw in your chosen metaphor: if Hamster Chops is analagous to an infant in a pram, who has thrown his toys out, then how could said infant reach those toys, in order to be able to pick them up? I mean, it doesn't immediately make sense. Surely, it would be the person looking after the infant who would have the task of toy retrieval and return, as that would be an impossibility for the infant?

Re: Attandance at Batley : Thu Mar 19, 2015 2:50 am  

Ferocious Aardvark wrote:

I am also struggling a bit with the complexity of this advice, and whilst you're kindly offering to give free English comprehension masterclasses for those of us not blessed with your mastery of expression, could you just help me with a couple of points?

1. Despite me having ribbed you rather obviously about your previous grocer's apostrophe, you s'eem to have s'lipped another one in. This seems unfortunate, for a self-proclaimed master of comprehension, so I assume it has some hidden import that us mere mortals cannot grasp, and not a case of you being barely literate, but could you jus't clear it up for us'?

2. There's an apparent flaw in your chosen metaphor: if Hamster Chops is analagous to an infant in a pram, who has thrown his toys out, then how could said infant reach those toys, in order to be able to pick them up? I mean, it doesn't immediately make sense. Surely, it would be the person looking after the infant who would have the task of toy retrieval and return, as that would be an impossibility for the infant?

Well actually theres a flaw in your post..You quoted.

so my fatherly advice to you is pick your toys' up put them back in the pram ...

That makes part 2 of what you posted irrelevant..But keep the good work up..