Whats new about the 48hr recall clause? thought that was standard and didnt kick in until after the one month minimum loan period. Eg lilley came back to us triggering a new 1 month minimum loan at the nd of which he was recalled under the 48hr notice clause (although i thought it was 24hrs rather than 48hrs).
I don't know where the info is coming from, but it has to be incorrect. It's RFL rules on loan deals that they have to be for a minimum of one month / four weeks with no recall. It's to stop teams essentially dual registering with every club in the league by just allowing players to go out on a couple of days loan here and there to play for whoever has an opening that weekend.
Recall clauses can only kick in after the initial month. Nothing to do with club arrangements, it's RFL rules and regs.