Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:23 pm  

redeverready wrote:

When Mick likes to peddle the idea that he is so much in the know all about the Bulls a cryptic tweet like that was only going to set one course of action and that's exactly what it did. Him now saying it was about York, Workington and Featherstone why did he suddenly feel the need to tweet about it so soon after the final hooter in our game. A game everyone knew was important regarding money. IMO he was paying to his public image which blew up in the clubs face causing totally unnecessary panic for the club and fans.

Ah ok, so why take any notice then?

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:24 pm  

debaser wrote:

mat wrote:

It was Yorkshire radio tweeted about admin. But mick started rumours with his tweet about rfl needing contingency plans about what was round corner.

That didn't mention the Bulls, so it's hardly Mick's fault is it? People have misconstrued what he didn't say.
I still don't get the aggro he is getting. So Yorkshire Radio read that tweet and from that implied Bulls were heading for admin? Just how much power has Mick got?

If you check through my posts on here, you'll see that I actually posted in a thread about the RFL needing contingency plans about the financial situation at some Championship clubs, which I named.

If you watch the Yorkshire Radio video they clearly state the source of the rumours as Bradford Bulls players and their agents, which is why Marc Green mentioned scaremongering from within.

It seems there's a lot of agendas on here at the minute and for that tweet to get blamed for causing this is completely ludicrous in the extreme.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:31 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

If you check through my posts on here, you'll see that I actually posted in a thread about the RFL needing contingency plans about the financial situation at some Championship clubs, which I named.

If you watch the Yorkshire Radio video they clearly state the source of the rumours as Bradford Bulls players and their agents, which is why Marc Green mentioned scaremongering from within.

It seems there's a lot of agendas on here at the minute and for that tweet to get blamed for causing this is completely ludicrous in the extreme.

Like I've said it set the ball rolling and to keep believing it didn't it's naive.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:34 pm  

debaser wrote:

Ah ok, so why take any notice then?

I didn't but they are a lot of people who did. I don't believe that Mick had any idea what would happen but it did. I know a lot of people who follow him and they thought immediately it was about Bradford.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:35 pm  

redeverready wrote:

Like I've said it set the ball rolling and to keep believing it didn't it's naive.

Ok, that's your opinion and you're perfectly allowed to express that.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 10:50 pm  

MicktheGled wrote:

Ok, that's your opinion and you're perfectly allowed to express that.

Can I ask what did you think would happen considering the fan base was already worried about the financial implications of missing out on the top 4 and why you felt the need for such a cryptic tweet so soon after the game.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:11 pm  

Tasker banned presumably and gledhill suddenly all over forum. Just saying

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sat Jul 30, 2016 11:41 pm  

mat wrote:

Tasker banned presumably and gledhill suddenly all over forum. Just saying

Cheeky monkey Michael will be getting stressed again like the peter Hood profile.

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sun Jul 31, 2016 5:19 am  

Well I am starting a new club it is the Bradford Newesy Bulls it wil be run proper like and if you dont wanna join thats just fine but soon it will and there will see local businesses have all said they will back it I mean big time my mate has already said that he will play and we need a coach so please apply no time wasters

Re: Bradford New Bulls : Sun Jul 31, 2016 6:55 am  

MicktheGled wrote:

Ok, that's your opinion and you're perfectly allowed to express that.

Mick, given the timing of the tweet it's blatantly obvious that you were talking about Bradford.

You always try to back peddle when you've been caught talking cack. Why don't you stick to the commentary instead of claiming to be in the know? Or at least stick to your gins and stand by your story?